> Would you still be interested in a jessie backport? I had forgotten I
> was also interested, but I've since upgraded my machines to current
> stable (stretch) so I'm not as invested in this anymore. I'm curious to
> test interest though.
Not anymore no. This was a while ago and my machines now a
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:56:07PM -0400, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
duc looks _really_ nice and I would like to use it on servers running
Jessie.
Do you think it would be possible to backport it?
Would you still be interested in a jessie backport? I had forgotten I
was also interested, b
Hi Louis-Philippe Véronneau,
> Package: duc
> Version: 1.4.1-3
>
> Hi!
>
> duc looks _really_ nice and I would like to use it on servers running
> Jessie.
>
> Do you think it would be possible to backport it?
>
> Thanks for packaging this.
>
One already have the intention to do that:
https:
Package: duc
Version: 1.4.1-3
Hi!
duc looks _really_ nice and I would like to use it on servers running
Jessie.
Do you think it would be possible to backport it?
Thanks for packaging this.
--
pollo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
4 matches
Mail list logo