Bug#828556: sslscan: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2017-01-06 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2017-01-05 23:33:59 [+0100], Christoph Berg wrote: > > why on libssl-dev (<< 1.1.0~)? > > The | libssl-dev (<< 1.1.0~) part is there to enable backporting to > jessie without having to revert libssl1.0-dev back to libssl-dev. and I though that this is one of the changes you do when you intend

Bug#828556: sslscan: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2017-01-05 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2017-01-05 <20170105203350.67bp6zhioblxu...@breakpoint.cc> > On 2017-01-05 15:08:00 [+0100], Christoph Berg wrote: > > NMU diff: > > > > > > Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format) > > > > Build-Depends: debh

Bug#828556: sslscan: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2017-01-05 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2017-01-05 15:08:00 [+0100], Christoph Berg wrote: > NMU diff: > > > Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format) > > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), {+libssl1.0-dev |+} libssl-dev {+(<< > 1.1.0~)+} why on libssl-dev (<< 1.1.0~)? Otherwi

Bug#828556: sslscan: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2017-01-05 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Adrian Bunk 2016-12-21 <20161221212734.64mvgghokxot7...@bunk.spdns.de> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 04:53:58PM +0100, Marvin Stark wrote: > > Am 2016-11-10 23:33, schrieb Sebastian Andrzej Siewior: > >... > > > Marvin: unless Adrian pulls out a patch I suggest you prepare a package > > > to build

Bug#828556: sslscan: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-11-30 Thread Marvin Stark
Am 2016-11-10 23:33, schrieb Sebastian Andrzej Siewior: On 2016-11-10 12:10:04 [+0200], Adrian Bunk wrote: On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 09:55:46PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/rbsec/sslscan/issues/108 Sebastian, Marvin, what is the status regard

Bug#828556: sslscan: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-11-11 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:33:40PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2016-11-10 12:10:04 [+0200], Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 09:55:46PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/rbsec/sslscan/issues/108 > > > > Sebastian,

Bug#828556: sslscan: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-11-10 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2016-11-10 12:10:04 [+0200], Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 09:55:46PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/rbsec/sslscan/issues/108 > > Sebastian, Marvin, what is the status regarding getting this patch that > was applied upstream

Bug#828556: sslscan: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-11-10 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 09:55:46PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/rbsec/sslscan/issues/108 Sebastian, Marvin, what is the status regarding getting this patch that was applied upstream included in Debian? Thanks Adrian -- "Is there not

Bug#828556: sslscan: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-09-01 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/rbsec/sslscan/issues/108

Bug#828556: sslscan: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Source: sslscan Version: 1.11.5-rbsec-1 Severity: important Control: block 827061 by -1 Hi, OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at: https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/At