Hi Aaron,
> My expectation ws that depending on the processor's capabilities, this
> code would either succeed (on reasonably modern processors) or fail with
> SIGILL (Illegal instruction). In general, i386 binaries should be able
> to use modern processor features on suitable hardware; GCC just
Sascha Steinbiss writes:
> I can’t see why code containing SSE instructions would run on i386?
My expectation ws that depending on the processor's capabilities, this
code would either succeed (on reasonably modern processors) or fail with
SIGILL (Illegal instruction). In general, i386 binaries
Dear Aaron,
thanks for your report and for caring about the non-x86 archs!
> Builds for libssw failed on the vast majority architectures due to lack
> of support for x86 SSE instructions. AFAICT, libssw specifically makes a
> point of using these instructions, so support for non-x86 architecture
Source: libssw
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: important
Justification: fails to build from source
Builds for libssw failed on the vast majority architectures due to lack
of support for x86 SSE instructions. AFAICT, libssw specifically makes a
point of using these instructions, so support for non-x86 ar
4 matches
Mail list logo
