On Mon, 2016-06-20 at 12:15 -0700, Leo L. Schwab wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 12:54:15PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sun, 2016-06-19 at 14:35 -0700, Leo L. Schwab wrote:
> > > When you install task-xfce-desktop, from a dependency standpoint, it
> > > becomes the "parent" of all things
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 12:54:15PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-06-19 at 14:35 -0700, Leo L. Schwab wrote:
> > When you install task-xfce-desktop, from a dependency standpoint, it
> > becomes the "parent" of all things XFCE -- the task is marked as manually
> > installed; its depe
On Sun, 2016-06-19 at 14:35 -0700, Leo L. Schwab wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 11:24:13AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > So yes, we *want* light-locker in the default Debian Xfce desktop. But that
> > doesn't mean you can't use something else with the Xfce desktop environment
> > under debi
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 11:24:13AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> So yes, we *want* light-locker in the default Debian Xfce desktop. But that
> doesn't mean you can't use something else with the Xfce desktop environment
> under debian: just remove light-locker. Yes, it'll remove task-xfce-deskto
On dim., 2016-06-19 at 09:59 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
>
> I'm surprised this is news for you.
This is not. And we're not going anywhere.
>
> Depends are used when something doesnt work without the depends. XFCE
> definitly works without a screensaver.
So you actuallu missed my point,
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 11:50:18AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On dim., 2016-06-19 at 09:19 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 11:08:56AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > Because we *want* light-locker as part of the default Xfce install.
> > Well, having it in recom
On dim., 2016-06-19 at 09:19 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 11:08:56AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > Because we *want* light-locker as part of the default Xfce install.
>
> Well, having it in recommends is enough for that.
Then I don't see the point in having Depends:
On dim., 2016-06-19 at 02:01 -0700, Leo L. Schwab wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 10:46:55AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > task-xfce-desktop is for installation time, so here Depends is correct. We
> > want light-locker by default, but people are free to remove it afterwards
> > if
> > they
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 11:08:56AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Because we *want* light-locker as part of the default Xfce install.
Well, having it in recommends is enough for that.
--
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 10:46:55AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> task-xfce-desktop is for installation time, so here Depends is correct. We
> want light-locker by default, but people are free to remove it afterwards if
> they know what they do.
>
Uh, no, because when you go to delete li
On dim., 2016-06-19 at 08:03 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 08:57:44AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > > task-xfce-desktop is for installation time, so here Depends is correct.
> > > We
> > > want light-locker by default, but people are free to remove it
> > > afterwards
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 08:57:44AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > task-xfce-desktop is for installation time, so here Depends is correct. We
> > want light-locker by default, but people are free to remove it afterwards if
> > they know what they do.
I still don't see why this cannot be achiev
tags 827562 wontfix
thanks
Quoting Yves-Alexis Perez (cor...@debian.org):
> > > I suggest that task-xfce-desktop reduce the dependency on
> > > light-locker from Depends to Recommends.
>
> task-xfce-desktop is for installation time, so here Depends is correct. We
> want light-locker by default
On sam., 2016-06-18 at 07:25 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Xfce people, could you please bring some input on that issue?
Sure.
>
> TIA
>
> Quoting Leo L. Schwab (ew...@ewhac.org):
> > Package: task-xfce-desktop
> > Version: 3.35
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Dear Maintainer,
> >
> > tas
Xfce people, could you please bring some input on that issue?
TIA
Quoting Leo L. Schwab (ew...@ewhac.org):
> Package: task-xfce-desktop
> Version: 3.35
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> task-xfce-desktop has grown a dependency on the package
> light-locker, which is billed as a
Package: task-xfce-desktop
Version: 3.35
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
task-xfce-desktop has grown a dependency on the package
light-locker, which is billed as a lightweight alternative to xscreensaver.
I suspect this is to track a similar change in xfce4-session, which recently
also
16 matches
Mail list logo
