Hi Sean, Paul,
>> I think you should use a suffix other than -dbg because people expect
>> -dbg to be detached debugging symbols.
>
> I would go with either -dbg (slight preference) or -debug.
Thanks for the advice! Since -dbg is expected to carry a different
content by so many people, I would go
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Sean Whitton wrote:
> I think you should use a suffix other than -dbg because people expect
> -dbg to be detached debugging symbols.
I would go with either -dbg (slight preference) or -debug.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
* Sean Whitton , 2016-05-27, 17:15:
I think you should use a suffix other than -dbg because people expect
-dbg to be detached debugging symbols. You could write to
debian-de...@lists.debian.org and/or debian-ment...@lists.debian.org to
see if anyone is aware of a precedent;
Hey, we are alread
Hello,
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:55:07PM +0200, Jose Luis Blanco wrote:
> > Based on your description, it sounds like the -g packages might be
> > useful for someone. The only question is what you should call the
> > binary package. Are you saying that those packages already exist in
> > Debian
Hi Sean,
>> Now that those -dbg packages have been renamed to -dbgsym, do you
>> think it may be a good idea to generate again those debug packages?
>> I would be really thankful for any advice regarding "good practices"
>> in this sense...
>
> Based on your description, it sounds like the -g pack
control: owner -1 !
Dear Jose,
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:06:50PM +0200, Jose Luis Blanco wrote:
> Thank you very much for the review, indeed any help is appreciated!
No problem!
> > You should drop the libmrpt-dbg package, since we now have automatic
> > *-dbgsym binary package generation.
>
Dear Sean,
Thank you very much for the review, indeed any help is appreciated!
> You should drop the libmrpt-dbg package, since we now have automatic
> *-dbgsym binary package generation.
Done (upstream). I wasn't aware of this change.
In the past, I provided -dbg packages with a totally differe
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
Since 2008, I have had one very kind mentor taking care of my package
"mrpt" (home page [1]),
but I have not had any news from him for more than ~1 month, so I
thought it would be a good
idea to find out if someone else would be will
8 matches
Mail list logo
