Hi,
>Done. I did a couple of nme runs in a sid chroot, and then fixed
>lintian errors. It might be possible to compact the debian/copying
>stanza, but my goal was maximum correctness so I didn't take any
>risks. Lintian said that copyright entries for config/* weren't
>necessary. Is this true
On 9 May 2016 at 13:18, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>>Per https://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals , I filed Bug #823848
>>"as an RC bug on the package".
>
> I have reassigned it to ftpmasters, I don't think there is need to wait for
> the maintainer opinion, this is a binary without source.
T
Hi,
>Per https://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals , I filed Bug #823848
>"as an RC bug on the package".
I have reassigned it to ftpmasters, I don't think there is need to wait for
the maintainer opinion, this is a binary without source.
>I did two runs of license-reconsile, after fixing the
On 9 May 2016 at 04:31, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>>Waiting for his reply.
>
>
> this seems the most important bit, I would appreciate you opening a bug
> report against
> the package (severity:important), explaining why you want a version in
> experimental,
> leaving xnox the time to answer
Hi Nicholas,
>I agree, however, upstream's official recommendation is to use a
>version of btrfs-progs at least as new as the kernel. Every release
>fixes some bugs, sometimes serious. For example, btrfs-progs-4.5
>fixes "subvol sync: fix crash, memory corruption", but the whole 4.5
>series is
Hi Gianfranco
On 6 May 2016 at 04:32, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>
> Hi, it would be nice to avoid having a possible and problematic version even
> in experimental.
> Specially because it might be source of data-losses to the end users.
>
I agree, however, upstream's official recommendation is
control: tags -1 moreinfo
control: owner -1 !
Hi, it would be nice to avoid having a possible and problematic version even in
experimental.
Specially because it might be source of data-losses to the end users.
BTW, please ask xnox to comaintain the package, if you really want to help in
packagi
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "btrfs-progs". I've read
upstream reports of regressions in the 4.5.x series that were solved
by downgrading to 4.4.x, so I believe that it is most appropriate to
upload to experimental at this
8 matches
Mail list logo
