On 2016-08-28 18:55, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> control: tag -1 + patch
> control: tag -1 + upstream
> control: tag -1 + fixed-upstream
>
> On 2016-08-25 14:16, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > I am therefore cloning this bug and reassigning the clone to pygobject.
> > I don't simply reassigning it as the /
control: tag -1 + patch
control: tag -1 + upstream
control: tag -1 + fixed-upstream
On 2016-08-25 14:16, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I am therefore cloning this bug and reassigning the clone to pygobject.
> I don't simply reassigning it as the /collection/delete-sync test is
> also failing, though it
clone 821347 -1
reassign -1 pygobject
retitle -1 pygobject: wrong enum to hash conversion on 64-bit big endian
affects -1 libsecret
block 821347 by -1
thanks
On 2016-08-25 09:15, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2016-07-27 14:23, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > On 27/07/16 14:16, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On 2016-07-27 14:23, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 27/07/16 14:16, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2016-07-10 21:24, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> >> Hello Bastian Blank.
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 12:33:12PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 10:12:31PM +0200, Andreas
On 27/07/16 14:16, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2016-07-10 21:24, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
>> Hello Bastian Blank.
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 12:33:12PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 10:12:31PM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
I'd like to ask for your help with look
On 2016-07-10 21:24, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Hello Bastian Blank.
>
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 12:33:12PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 10:12:31PM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > > I'd like to ask for your help with looking at the problems building
> > > libsecret
Hello Bastian Blank.
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 12:33:12PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 10:12:31PM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > I'd like to ask for your help with looking at the problems building
> > libsecret on s390x. It's currently the only (release-)architecture
>
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 10:12:31PM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> I'd like to ask for your help with looking at the problems building
> libsecret on s390x. It's currently the only (release-)architecture
> not building and blocking testing migration for a long time. :(
What was the result of yo
Hello Debian s390x porters!
I'd like to ask for your help with looking at the problems building
libsecret on s390x. It's currently the only (release-)architecture
not building and blocking testing migration for a long time. :(
It seems the testsuite somehow gets stuck on your arch/buildd
htt
9 matches
Mail list logo
