On 03/10/2016 11:25 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> Hmmm. Is it still written somewhere that the default depth is 8 ? If
> yes, then clearly we should modify that.
>
I am not sure 8 is mentioned anywhere. I vaguely remember resorting to
wikipedia to find out what all these alternatives were abou
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:25 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:58 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
>>Whilst debugging the two desktop menu items in imagemagick (separate bug), it
>> was noticed that the two packages (imagemagick & imagemagick-6.q16) seem to
>> provide th
Hello,
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:58 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
> Whilst debugging the two desktop menu items in imagemagick (separate bug), it
> was noticed that the two packages (imagemagick & imagemagick-6.q16) seem to
> provide the same binary, despite the q16 package being advertised as having
Package: imagemagick
Version: 8:6.8.9.9-5
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Whilst debugging the two desktop menu items in imagemagick (separate bug), it
was noticed that the two packages (imagemagick & imagemagick-6.q16) seem to
provide the same binary, despite the q16 package being advertised a
4 matches
Mail list logo
