El 10/05/16 a las 17:22, Gianfranco Costamagna escribió:
>
> can you please fix the copyright?
> (I can also look at a "lintian-problematic" file and tell you what is wrong
> in that case,
> otherwise my answer is too generic I admit)
>
> thanks!
>
> Gianfranco
>
fixed, uploaded again and lin
Hi,
>https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aseqjoy/aseqjoy_0.0.2-1.dsc
>I just upload to mentors.
wonderful!
>If use Files: * (for the upstream) and Files: debian/* (for mantainer)
>and both have same license this raise the lintian warning.
You shouldn't have any issue by doing
Files
El 09/05/16 a las 12:10, Gianfranco Costamagna escribió:
> yes, thanks Alexander for your effort, I personally don't like restricting
> licenses,
> specially when they are just an honest upstream mistake!
>
> Gianfranco
>
>
Hello all!
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aseqjoy/aseqj
yes, thanks Alexander for your effort, I personally don't like restricting
licenses,
specially when they are just an honest upstream mistake!
Gianfranco
Il Lunedì 9 Maggio 2016 16:59, Fernando Toledo ha
scritto:
El 07/05/16 a las 08:31, Alexander Koenig escribió:
> On Fri, May 06, 2016, G
El 07/05/16 a las 08:31, Alexander Koenig escribió:
> On Fri, May 06, 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> <..>
>> I would appreciate however a new tarball, because I don't like having to
>> tell ftpmasters
>> where to look in the mail list for the license change.
>
> OK, to settle this I created
On Fri, May 06, 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
<..>
> I would appreciate however a new tarball, because I don't like having to tell
> ftpmasters
> where to look in the mail list for the license change.
OK, to settle this I created a new aseqjoy release, that should remove all
license
ambigui
Hi Adam,
>What's the problem?
none, you are right!
I read again your previous mail, and yes, there is no conflict assuming we use
GPL2 only.
I would appreciate however a new tarball, because I don't like having to tell
ftpmasters
where to look in the mail list for the license change.
Anywa
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 09:55:47AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> unfortunately I'm not sure this is enough for ftpmasters...
>
> I'm afraid we need an official tarball with the fixed licenses, otherwise
> they won't be coherent license-wise.
>
> this seems to be a blocker for now.
What's
Hi Alexander,
unfortunately I'm not sure this is enough for ftpmasters...
I'm afraid we need an official tarball with the fixed licenses, otherwise
they won't be coherent license-wise.
this seems to be a blocker for now.
g.
Il Lunedì 2 Maggio 2016 21:27, Alexander Koenig ha scritto:
Hi th
Hi there,
the release is pretty dated; for sure I had no intentions to limit
aseqjoy to strict GPL-V2 so you can consider aseqjoy-0.0.1 to be
GPL-V2+. This applies to all copyrightable files, including the man
page.
Thanks,
Alex
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 09:31:50PM -0300, Fernando Toledo wrote:
> El 29/04/16 a las 18:31, Adam Borowski escribió:
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 08:45:27PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> >> licensecheck *
> >> shows the license of some files as GPL-2+ not GPL-2
> >
> > It looks like there's
El 29/04/16 a las 18:31, Adam Borowski escribió:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 08:45:27PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>>> Fixed. Is possible to have upstream => gpl2 and debian/* => gpl3, true?
>>
>> this means that it will be impossible to forward patches upstream without
>> manually
>> relic
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 08:45:27PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> >Fixed. Is possible to have upstream => gpl2 and debian/* => gpl3, true?
>
> this means that it will be impossible to forward patches upstream without
> manually
> relicensing them.
>
> I personally don't prefer, because on
Hi,
sorry for the lag
>Fixed. Is possible to have upstream => gpl2 and debian/* => gpl3, true?
this means that it will be impossible to forward patches upstream without
manually
relicensing them.
I personally don't prefer, because only the author of each patch will be able
to forward
it ups
El 06/04/16 a las 05:24, Gianfranco Costamagna escribió:
> control: owner -1 !
> control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi, lets review:
>
> check-all-the-things review:
> Please add some upstream metadata: https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata
>
>
Added! (i'm not sure if need i to add more fields.)
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi, lets review:
check-all-the-things review:
Please add some upstream metadata: https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata
debian/copyright: please use the same upstream license, and for Debian
packaging
LGPL-2.1 seems unfeasible anyway (I think
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "aseqjoy"
* Package name: aseqjoy
Version : 0.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Alexander Koenig
* URL : https://terminatorx.org/addons
* License : GPL-2
17 matches
Mail list logo
