On 24/02/16 23:20, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
* Emilio Pozuelo Monfort [2016-02-24 18:25]:
Looks like some packages are failing to build. Can you take a look?
I've pushed fixes for everything, but now we got bitten by the new
urdfdom version and #815814.
That's sorted. This is blocked by #81
On 23/02/16 22:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 23/02/16 15:24, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for the quick confirmation. I've uploaded the package to unstable
>> and pushed one rdepends which wouldn't build oherwise. Can someone start
>> the binNMUs or do I need to do somethi
On 23/02/16 15:24, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the quick confirmation. I've uploaded the package to unstable
> and pushed one rdepends which wouldn't build oherwise. Can someone start
> the binNMUs or do I need to do something else?
Scheduled.
Emilio
Hi,
Thanks for the quick confirmation. I've uploaded the package to unstable
and pushed one rdepends which wouldn't build oherwise. Can someone start
the binNMUs or do I need to do something else?
Cheers Jochen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 21/02/16 10:09, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi,
>
> we want to transition librosconsole to link against log4cxx instead of an
> internal print ve
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
we want to transition librosconsole to link against log4cxx instead of an
internal print version. librosconsole exports these symbols, so other packages
depend on the choice and we c
6 matches
Mail list logo