On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 06:52:59 +, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
(CC'ing debian-perl, as this belongs more on the list than in the
BTS + R-T and M-F-T set.)
> > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-perl/2016/03/msg00038.html
> I guess you can proceed with your initial plan and see what breaks. We
> can eas
-=| gregor herrmann, 05.04.2016 19:57:01 +0200 |=-
> On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 11:59:33 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
>
> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-perl/2016/03/msg00038.html
I guess you can proceed with your initial plan and see what breaks. We
can easily restore the non-native package if tha
On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 11:59:33 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-perl/2016/03/msg00038.html
Not much going on there but:
> But yes, we should get 0.90 out of the door to fix some bugs.
This stills stands.
I've made a few minor last changes in Git earlier today.
I'm
On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 17:51:47 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 16:39:52 +0200 gregor herrmann wrote:
> > Updated in Git.
> Sounds like it is ready for upload?
Yup; except that I started a discussion about the package's source
format in the meantime:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-per
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 16:39:52 +0200 gregor herrmann wrote:
> Updated in Git.
Sounds like it is ready for upload?
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 14:28:53 +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > [...]
> >
>
> Aren't you relying on apt-file to provide the conffiles for fetching the
> Contents files as well?
Do you mean /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50apt-file.conf? Yes, that was the file
I was referring to with "provides the necessary
gregor herrmann:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 11:14:39 +, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
>
>>> Any opinions on 'apt-file (>= 3)' vs. 'apt (>= 1.1.8)'?
>> I think 'apt-file (>= 3)' is better, since we use apt-file's
>> interface, not apt directly.
>
> Actually, in my understanding, we're not using apt-file b
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 11:14:39 +, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> > Any opinions on 'apt-file (>= 3)' vs. 'apt (>= 1.1.8)'?
> I think 'apt-file (>= 3)' is better, since we use apt-file's
> interface, not apt directly.
Actually, in my understanding, we're not using apt-file but apt stuff
directly (that
-=| gregor herrmann, 30.03.2016 18:16:29 +0200 |=-
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 17:09:32 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 08:29:04 +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > > Damyan Ivanov:
> > > > What I am not clear about is whether this interface to apt-file is
> > > > something new that
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 17:09:32 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 08:29:04 +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > Damyan Ivanov:
> > > What I am not clear about is whether this interface to apt-file is
> > > something new that is not available in stable. If so, we'd need either
> > > a s
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 08:29:04 +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Damyan Ivanov:
> > FWIW the changes look good to me and now that the tests pass I see no
> > reasons why this can't be merged in the master branch and released.
Great, thanks for checking!
> > What I am not clear about is whether this i
Damyan Ivanov:
> -=| gregor herrmann, 25.03.2016 17:19:47 +0100 |=-
>> [...]
>
> Thank you gregor for your work on this!
>
Indeed - thanks gregor
> FWIW the changes look good to me and now that the tests pass I see no
> reasons why this can't be merged in the master branch and released.
>
> W
-=| gregor herrmann, 25.03.2016 17:19:47 +0100 |=-
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 20:14:42 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 22:00:18 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > > The dh-make-perl package has code to access the apt-file cache
> > > directly. In apt-file 3, this cache is removed
On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 20:14:42 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 22:00:18 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > The dh-make-perl package has code to access the apt-file cache
> > directly. In apt-file 3, this cache is removed (merged into APT's
> > cache).
>
> I pushed a first try to a
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 22:00:18 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> The dh-make-perl package has code to access the apt-file cache
> directly. In apt-file 3, this cache is removed (merged into APT's
> cache).
>
> Please update dh-make-perl accordingly.
>
> * Please use "apt-get indextargets [--format .
Package: dh-make-perl
Severity: normal
Tags: sid stretch
Usertags: apt-file-3
Hi,
The dh-make-perl package has code to access the apt-file cache
directly. In apt-file 3, this cache is removed (merged into APT's
cache).
Please update dh-make-perl accordingly.
* Please use "apt-get indextargets
16 matches
Mail list logo
