Bug#814550: RFS: codecrypt/1.7.3-1 (ITP #814462)

2016-04-21 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, >This was done roughly for the same reason as with GnuPG, that has the "gpg" >executable. Also I'm not quite a fan of using crypto without reading the >manual >thoroughly :] indeed :) >Anyway, is there some best place (other than documentations) to notify the >users? Possibly create a sym

Bug#814550: RFS: codecrypt/1.7.3-1 (ITP #814462)

2016-04-17 Thread Miroslav Kratochvil
Thanks a lot for the review, I've fixed the license issues, libs and build deps. New uploaded version should appear on mentors in no time. The code with `make dist' and `mk-orig-source' is a fossil from first packaging attempt (trying to get both GBP and development in one repo). Now the package r

Bug#814550: RFS: codecrypt/1.7.3-1 (ITP #814462)

2016-04-04 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, lets review: control: autotools-dev, dh-autoreconf, I think autoreconf alone should be enough. libgmp10, libcrypto++9v5, libfftw3-double3 on noes! shlibs:Depends should do that automatically. If not, it means your binaries are not linking corr

Bug#814550: RFS: codecrypt/1.7.3-1 (ITP #814462)

2016-02-12 Thread Miroslav Kratochvil
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "codecrypt" * Package name: codecrypt Version : 1.7.3-1 Upstream Author : Mirek Kratochvil * URL : https://github.com/exaexa/codecrypt * License : LGPL