Bug#810018: Additional info possibly relevant for procps-base/pidof ...

2018-11-22 Thread Josh Triplett
On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 03:19:58 +0200 Michael Biebl wrote: > On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 22:03:06 +1000 Craig Small wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 at 19:38 Simon McVittie wrote: > > > > > If we want pidof to be provided by a new procps-base instead of > > > sysvinit-utils for buster, maybe now is the time t

Bug#810018: Additional info possibly relevant for procps-base/pidof ...

2018-07-09 Thread Michael Biebl
On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 22:03:06 +1000 Craig Small wrote: > On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 at 19:38 Simon McVittie wrote: > > > If we want pidof to be provided by a new procps-base instead of > > sysvinit-utils for buster, maybe now is the time to start uploading > > packages with that change to experimental? >

Bug#810018: Additional info possibly relevant for procps-base/pidof ...

2018-07-09 Thread Simon McVittie
On Mon, 09 Jul 2018 at 22:03:06 +1000, Craig Small wrote: > On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 at 19:38 Simon McVittie wrote: > > This appears to have been fixed before procps 3.3.12 (which is in stretch) > > if I'm reading changelogs correctly? > > > This was the revert of the namespace problem? "This" referred

Bug#810018: Additional info possibly relevant for procps-base/pidof ...

2018-07-09 Thread Craig Small
On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 at 19:38 Simon McVittie wrote: > If we want pidof to be provided by a new procps-base instead of > sysvinit-utils for buster, maybe now is the time to start uploading > packages with that change to experimental? > I'd say if it is going to happen, it should happen now. > This

Bug#810018: Additional info possibly relevant for procps-base/pidof ...

2018-07-09 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sun, 17 Apr 2016 at 07:00:09 +, Craig Small wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 3:15 AM Andreas Henriksson wrote: > > The policy-related service management tools moved into into > > init-system-helpers yesterdays uploads of sysvinit[1] and > > init-system-helpers[2]. This means service is no l

Bug#810018: Additional info possibly relevant for procps-base/pidof ...

2016-04-17 Thread Craig Small
Hi Andreas, One thing before we move to the procps pid, it doesn't match all processes the pidof one does [1]. I have fixed it upstream but probably worth waiting for that to appear otherwise things like kde and sshd sessions "disappear". - Craig 1: https://gitlab.com/procps-ng/procps/issues/4

Bug#810018: Additional info possibly relevant for procps-base/pidof ...

2016-01-19 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hello Craig Small. Here's a small status update which might be relevant to consider for this bug report regarding procps-base / pidof. The policy-related service management tools moved into into init-system-helpers yesterdays uploads of sysvinit[1] and init-system-helpers[2]. This means service i