On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 06:17:52PM +, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote:
> > Presumably you can manually configure it to use the "dummy"
> > implementation on an Intel processor. Does that work?
>
> It appears not to. The 3 failures that occurred on armhf can be
> obtained on amd64 thus:
>
> ./confi
> Presumably you can manually configure it to use the "dummy"
> implementation on an Intel processor. Does that work?
It appears not to. The 3 failures that occurred on armhf can be
obtained on amd64 thus:
./configure --enable-dummy
make
make check
ftp://selab.janelia.org/pub/software/hmmer3/3.1b2/Userguide.pdf says:
"""
Processor: HMMER depends on vector parallelization methods that are
supported on most modern processors. H3 requires either an
x86-compatible (IA32, IA64, or Intel64) processor that supports the
SSE2 vector instruction set,
Hi Sean,
thanks for the fast clarification. It would be great if you could keep
me informed in case you would enhance the number of architectures to
make sure we will follow this move.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 01:21:25AM +, Eddy, Sean wrote:
> HMMER3 is currently
Hi Sean,
I'd like to forward this issue to you as the hmmer author. Since in
Debian packages are usually build on several different architectures
sometimes hidden bugs are detected. Since arm64 and ppc64el might
become relevant in bioinformatics in the not to distant future I'd
consider this iss
A lot of the test failures seen in
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=hmmer&arch=arm64&ver=3.1b2-1&stamp=1436134634
are not easily reproducible.
For example, when I tried
cd testsuite/
touch tmp ; rm tmp* ; ./i9-optional-annotation.pl .. .. tmp
it gave "ok" most of the time,
Hi Andreas,
> would you mind contacting upstream or arm porters about this since you
> seem to have done a quite detailed research on the issue ?
Sure, I will contact both and see if they know more.
Best,
Sascha
>
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 10:20:54PM +, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
>> Source: h
Hi Sascha,
would you mind contacting upstream or arm porters about this since you
seem to have done a quite detailed research on the issue ?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 10:20:54PM +, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
> Source: hmmer
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
Source: hmmer
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
while reviewing the reproducible builds output for the barrnap package,
which depends on nhmmer, I noticed that a nhmmer problem seems to break
barrnap's post-build test run [1].
I'm suspecting this is platform related as it has never occured befor
9 matches
Mail list logo