Hi Scott!
On 06/29/2016 06:59 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I just looked at fixing this, but I see that the build log for the current
> version, qscintilla2_2.9.2+dfsg-2, is not on buildd.d.o.
This can happen if the buildd itself has trouble sending email. I have now
rescheduled the qscintilla2
On Saturday, May 14, 2016 01:39:11 PM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Scott!
>
> > c++ symbols files are a paint o deal with and do (particularly in
> > qscintilla's case vary per-architecture. Updating only one
> > architecture tends to be error prone. I will include a fix for this
> > wi
Hi Scott!
> c++ symbols files are a paint o deal with and do (particularly in
> qscintilla's case vary per-architecture. Updating only one
> architecture tends to be error prone. I will include a fix for this
> with the next new upstream release when all archs need updating.
Any news on this?
On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 10:24:56 +0100 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> On 11/29/2015 01:23 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > qscintilla2 currently fails to build from source on sparc64 due to several
> > symbols files having mismatched symbols for this architecture.
> >
> > Please update th
On 11/29/2015 01:23 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> qscintilla2 currently fails to build from source on sparc64 due to several
> symbols files having mismatched symbols for this architecture.
>
> Please update the symbols file using the diff provided in the build log [1].
I just uploaded a
Source: qscintilla2
Version: 2.9.1+dfsg-3
Severity: normal
User: debian-sp...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: sparc64
Hello!
qscintilla2 currently fails to build from source on sparc64 due to several
symbols files having mismatched symbols for this architecture.
Please update the symbols file using t
6 matches
Mail list logo
