Bug#805167: suggested rpcbind.socket

2016-03-04 Thread Anders Hammarquist
[didn't think to subscribe to this bug, so I didn't see this until now] On Thu, 24 Dec 2015 10:57:02 +0100 Laurent Bigonville wrote: > > nis can't be the only rpc service that talks to rpcbind over inet rather > > than unix sockets, and custom rpc services are probably more likely > > to use inet

Bug#805167: suggested rpcbind.socket

2015-12-24 Thread Laurent Bigonville
> nis can't be the only rpc service that talks to rpcbind over inet rather > than unix sockets, and custom rpc services are probably more likely > to use inet. The path of least surprise is clearly to start rpcbind > on inet socket access as well. > > You could argue that it should only start on a

Bug#805167: suggested rpcbind.socket

2015-12-14 Thread Anders Hammarquist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 nis can't be the only rpc service that talks to rpcbind over inet rather than unix sockets, and custom rpc services are probably more likely to use inet. The path of least surprise is clearly to start rpcbind on inet socket access as well. You could a