Bug#803825: hedgewars: FTBFS with FFmpeg 2.9

2015-11-05 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
Hi Gianfranco, On 04.11.2015 15:13, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > then I'll upload as soon as the previous one reach testing. That's fine, thanks. > thanks again, for the great help, in the future I'm sure I'll be able to try > to fix this mess > by myself (the first step is alwasy the biggest

Bug#803825: hedgewars: FTBFS with FFmpeg 2.9

2015-11-04 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
HI Andreas, > >This is documented in FFmpeg's APIchanges [1], also installed in ffmpeg-doc. thanks, this will make my life easier in next ffmpeg changes! >Unfortunately, you didn't copy this correctly... damn, bad me :) I thought the version was the same, they were just three defines pointing

Bug#803825: hedgewars: FTBFS with FFmpeg 2.9

2015-11-04 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
Hi Gianfranco, On 04.11.2015 10:49, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >> That's not correct: the alternatives have been present for a >> long time, so that the deprecated functions will be removed >> in the next version. > > thanks, this is something I was wondering, even if I couldn't easily find > w

Bug#803825: hedgewars: FTBFS with FFmpeg 2.9

2015-11-04 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi Andreas, unfortunately this change breaks libav 4:0.8.17-0ubuntu0.12.04.1 the version in ubuntu precise (and travis-ci) https://travis-ci.org/hedgewars/hw/jobs/89182800 cheers, G. Il Mercoledì 4 Novembre 2015 10:49, Gianfranco Costamagna ha scritto: Hi Andreas, > >That's not corre

Bug#803825: hedgewars: FTBFS with FFmpeg 2.9

2015-11-04 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi Andreas, > >That's not correct: the alternatives have been present for a >long time, so that the deprecated functions will be removed >in the next version. thanks, this is something I was wondering, even if I couldn't easily find when they were introduced. >While this will probably work, it

Bug#803825: hedgewars: FTBFS with FFmpeg 2.9

2015-11-03 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
Hi Gianfranco, On 03.11.2015 14:53, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > I assumed the difference has been introduced in version 57 That's not correct: the alternatives have been present for a long time, so that the deprecated functions will be removed in the next version. > so I did some > > #if LIB

Bug#803825: hedgewars: FTBFS with FFmpeg 2.9

2015-11-03 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi again, I assumed the difference has been introduced in version 57 so I did some #if LIBAVCODEC_VERSION_MAJOR > 56 in the code, and stuff seems to be building correctly. thanks for the bug report, I'll upload on unstable when convenient (assuming there is no hurry) cheers, and thanks again

Bug#803825: hedgewars: FTBFS with FFmpeg 2.9

2015-11-03 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi Andreas, unfortunately I can't apply the patch as-is because it will break backports. Do you know an easy way to #ifdef the patch to make it work on older ffmpeg/libav implementations? I tried to look at FFMPEG_VERSION and LIBAVCODEC_VERSION, but I'm not sure how to apply the code. here a

Bug#803825: hedgewars: FTBFS with FFmpeg 2.9

2015-11-02 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
Package: hedgewars Version: 0.9.22-dfsg-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: pkg-multimedia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ffmpeg2.9 Dear Maintainer, your package fails to build with the upcoming ffmpeg 2.9. This bug will become release-critical at some point when the ffmpeg2.9