On 19.01.2016 08:45, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> On Di, 2016-01-19 at 00:14 +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>> However, I don't understand your reasoning for not applying the patch
>> removing use of FF_API_EMU_EDGE.
>> It's only used in ffmpeg for backwards compatibility and thus
>> removing this fro
On Di, 2016-01-19 at 00:14 +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>
> > This now works with 2.8 and ffmpeg git master just fine without
> > possibly breaking with either version. Let me know if you still see
> > anything problematic.
>
> I cherry-picked these four patches onto 1.6.2-1 (in sid) and it
>
Control: tag -1 fixed-upstream
Hi Sebastian,
On 18.01.2016 08:21, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> I was bored at the airport on Saturday and merged all but one of the
> patches upstream now plus two additional ones. Take a look at the
> upstream bug report for details.
That's great! (I'm glad it helped
On Fr, 2016-01-08 at 21:24 +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> Thanks for your quick reply.
>
> On 08.01.2016 13:49, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> > I had no chance of looking closer yet,
>
> That's unfortunate.
I was bored at the airport on Saturday and merged all but one of the
pat
Hi Sebastian,
Thanks for your quick reply.
On 08.01.2016 13:49, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> I had no chance of looking closer yet,
That's unfortunate.
> testing will be easier once there are packages though.
How so? The replacements of the deprecated APIs have been present
for years, so you can t
On Do, 2016-01-07 at 23:58 +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> On 04.11.2015 21:20, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> > And also forwarded these upstream for review now, thanks again :) I
> > hope I find some time to review them myself soonish, but otherwise
> > I'm
> > sure someone else wi
Hi Sebastian,
On 04.11.2015 21:20, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> And also forwarded these upstream for review now, thanks again :) I
> hope I find some time to review them myself soonish, but otherwise I'm
> sure someone else will do it soon
What is the status of this?
The next version of FFmpeg is p
Hi Sebastian,
On 04.11.2015 21:20, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> On Di, 2015-11-03 at 21:14 +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>>
>> OK, split patches attached.
>
> And also forwarded these upstream for review now, thanks again :)
Thanks.
> I hope I find some time to review them myself soonish, but o
On Di, 2015-11-03 at 21:14 +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>
> OK, split patches attached.
And also forwarded these upstream for review now, thanks again :) I
hope I find some time to review them myself soonish, but otherwise I'm
sure someone else will do it soon
signature.asc
Description: This
Hi Sebastian,
On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 23:28:58 +0200 Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> Thanks for the patch, I've forwarded it upstream.
Thanks.
> It would've been nice
> to split it up into separate patches though: one for all the trivial
> renames and deletion of the removed defines, one for the deinterla
forwarded 803822 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757498
thanks
On Mo, 2015-11-02 at 22:06 +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>
> your package fails to build with the upcoming ffmpeg 2.9.
> This bug will become release-critical at some point when the
> ffmpeg2.9 transition gets closer.
>
Package: gst-libav1.0
Version: 1.6.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: pkg-multimedia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ffmpeg2.9
Dear Maintainer,
your package fails to build with the upcoming ffmpeg 2.9.
This bug will become release-critical at some point when the
ffmpeg2.9 tra
12 matches
Mail list logo
