Bug#803363: [PATCH] notmuch: workaround for FTBFS

2015-11-09 Thread David Bremner
Frederic Bonnard writes: > Hi David, > >> I tested with gdb 7.10-1 on amd64, and that seems not to be the case. >> All of the tests end up exiting 255 instead of 0 or 1. I didn't have time >> to dig deeper than that yet. > > I didn't remember the return codes, but on amd64, those tests passed. >

Bug#803363: [PATCH] notmuch: workaround for FTBFS

2015-11-09 Thread Frederic Bonnard
Hi David, > I tested with gdb 7.10-1 on amd64, and that seems not to be the case. > All of the tests end up exiting 255 instead of 0 or 1. I didn't have time > to dig deeper than that yet. I didn't remember the return codes, but on amd64, those tests passed. In the meantime, I found the patch for

Bug#803363: [PATCH] notmuch: workaround for FTBFS

2015-11-08 Thread David Bremner
Frederic Bonnard writes: > This should be fixed in gdb now, but it seems there's an issue on that. > So the workaround for the moment is to place a 2nd breakpoint on the LEP, > which is at the address of notmuch_database_add_message + 8. > On other architectures, this won't cause trouble as the f

Bug#803363: [PATCH] notmuch: workaround for FTBFS

2015-10-29 Thread Frederic Bonnard
Source: notmuch Source-Version: 0.21~rc3-3 Tags: patch User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ppc64el -- Hi, on ppc64el, there is a FTBFS on this version since 0.20.2-2 due a test failing (070). This is due to the fact that the test is using a breakpoint on the function notmuch_database