Bug#801653: sbuild ignores Maintainer in debian/control

2016-10-23 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi, On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 08:53:38 +0800 Drew Parsons wrote: > On Thu, 2015-12-24 at 01:09 +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote: > > I cannot reproduce this. Sbuild does not mangle the Maintainer field as you > > claim it does over here. Can you describe step by step what you did? > Take petsc as an examp

Bug#801653: sbuild ignores Maintainer in debian/control

2016-03-12 Thread Drew Parsons
On Thu, 2015-12-24 at 01:09 +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote: > Control: tag -1 + unreproducible moreinfo > > Hi, > > On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 10:58:50 +0800 Drew Parsons > wrote: > > > > sbuild by default assigns the user building the package as the > > Maintainer listed in the changes files.  That is

Bug#801653: sbuild ignores Maintainer in debian/control

2015-12-23 Thread Johannes Schauer
Control: tag -1 + unreproducible moreinfo Hi, On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 10:58:50 +0800 Drew Parsons wrote: > sbuild by default assigns the user building the package as the > Maintainer listed in the changes files. That is, sbuild ignores the > Maintainer: field in debian/control. > > This means a na

Bug#801653: sbuild ignores Maintainer in debian/control

2015-10-12 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: sbuild Version: 0.66.0-2 Severity: normal sbuild by default assigns the user building the package as the Maintainer listed in the changes files. That is, sbuild ignores the Maintainer: field in debian/control. This means a natural use of sbuild to build a team-maintained package results