Bug#800769: pbuilder: conffiles not removed

2015-10-13 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 06:13:40PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ❦ 12 octobre 2015 17:45 +0200, Jakub Wilk  : > > Another possibility is to refrain from fixing the bug, and let unlucky > > users clean their systems themselves. > > I think that's the best solution. All the more if the faulty pack

Bug#800769: pbuilder: conffiles not removed

2015-10-12 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 03:49:31PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 11:03:09AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > The only way to hand a file (any file) over to another package is by way of > > 'Replaces:', *without* the Conflicts: and Provides:. > > > > Since this is a single

Bug#800769: pbuilder: conffiles not removed

2015-10-12 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 12 octobre 2015 17:45 +0200, Jakub Wilk  : > I'd suggest to do something very simple instead: > In pbuilder's postinst, if pbuilder-uml status is not-installed, > simply rm -f /etc/pbuilder/pbuilder-uml.conf. If for some reason, a user has put a file with this exact same name here, it would be

Bug#800769: pbuilder: conffiles not removed

2015-10-12 Thread Jakub Wilk
As I understand it, this is what happened: src:pbuilder builds two binary packages: pbuilder and pbuilder-uml. pbuilder-uml depends on pbuilder. pbuilder suggests pbuilder-uml. pbuilder-uml ships /etc/pbuilder/pbuilder-uml.conf. pbuilder is of course not supposed to ship the same conffile. Beca

Bug#800769: pbuilder: conffiles not removed

2015-10-11 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 11:03:09AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > The only way to hand a file (any file) over to another package is by way of > 'Replaces:', *without* the Conflicts: and Provides:. > > Since this is a single packaga version, you could put the file in pbuilder-uml > and have that '

Bug#800769: pbuilder: conffiles not removed

2015-10-11 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 04:30:28PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Hi fellows debian-devel@ lurkers! > > On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 09:03:46PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 02:33:09PM +0200, Paul Wise wrote: > > > The recent upgrade did not deal with obsolete conffiles prope

Bug#800769: pbuilder: conffiles not removed

2015-10-10 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Hi fellows debian-devel@ lurkers! On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 09:03:46PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 02:33:09PM +0200, Paul Wise wrote: > > The recent upgrade did not deal with obsolete conffiles properly. > > Please use the dpkg-maintscript-helper support provided by dh_ins

Bug#800769: pbuilder: conffiles not removed

2015-10-10 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, 2015-10-03 at 21:03 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > How do you suggest to handle this? Hmm, to be honest I'm not sure how to pass ownership of conffiles between packages. I'd suggest asking debian-devel via IRC or mail. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Des

Bug#800769: pbuilder: conffiles not removed

2015-10-03 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
control: found -1 0.218 control: notfound -1 0.217 Hello Paul :) On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 02:33:09PM +0200, Paul Wise wrote: > The recent upgrade did not deal with obsolete conffiles properly. > Please use the dpkg-maintscript-helper support provided by dh_installdeb > to remove these obsolete con

Bug#800769: pbuilder: conffiles not removed

2015-10-03 Thread Paul Wise
Package: pbuilder Version: 0.219 Severity: normal User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: obsolete-conffile adequate The recent upgrade did not deal with obsolete conffiles properly. Please use the dpkg-maintscript-helper support provided by dh_installdeb to remove these obsolete conffiles on u