On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 04:16:44PM +0200, Stephan Sürken wrote:
> In your setup mini-buildd does not find any builder for the your arch
> (to eventually run sbuild on) in the first place.
Well, it shouldn't do that. It is clear from the meta information in
the .dsc that the package is not for armh
On So, 2015-07-26 at 11:22 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
(...)
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 11:04:45AM +0200, Stephan Sürken wrote:
> > Fwiw, currently, mini-buildd just uploads build requests to all builders
> > and completely relies on sbuild. This *is* a nice solution, as sbuild
> > knows best, and no
severity #793606 wishlist
retitle #793606 please don't upload build requests to archs that don't need
build
thanks
Hi Stephan,
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 11:04:45AM +0200, Stephan Sürken wrote:
> Fwiw, currently, mini-buildd just uploads build requests to all builders
> and completely relies on sbu
Moin,
On Sa, 2015-07-25 at 15:28 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
(...)
> my mini-buildd is configured to have architectures amd64, i386 and
> armhf. The armhf arch was just recently added so that I could poke
> locally built packages into the repository using direct reprepro calls
> and to be prepared
Source: mini-buildd
Version: 1.0.7
Severity: normal
Hi!
my mini-buildd is configured to have architectures amd64, i386 and
armhf. The armhf arch was just recently added so that I could poke
locally built packages into the repository using direct reprepro calls
and to be prepared to have mini-buil
5 matches
Mail list logo
