Re: Mehdi Dogguy 2016-01-21 <696fb80d6c0023c5e54ecfb56e670...@dogguy.org>
> Updated patch, without the changes in "applications/distcheck.ml".
Hi Mehdi,
thanks for your efforts. I'm afraid backporting extlib isn't trivial:
dose3
-> librpm-dev (>= 4.12) already in jessie-backports
-> ocamlgra
On 2016-01-20 01:14, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Hi,
On 19/01/2016 23:07, Christoph Berg wrote:
Long story, but that's the real-world example here. In fact I'm
considering upgrading the apt.pg.o build host to stretch just because
of this bugfix, and because a backport of the current dose-debcheck
vers
Hi,
On 19/01/2016 23:07, Christoph Berg wrote:
>
> Long story, but that's the real-world example here. In fact I'm
> considering upgrading the apt.pg.o build host to stretch just because
> of this bugfix, and because a backport of the current dose-debcheck
> version to jessie looks too hard.
>
Re: Johannes Schauer 2015-07-01 <20150701114957.2789.95115@hoothoot>
> Hi,
>
> Quoting Ralf Treinen (2015-06-30 19:22:43)
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 03:29:51PM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> >
> > > As for the second problem (the empty Packages file) I was annoyed by this
> > > myself for a lo
Hi,
Quoting Ralf Treinen (2015-06-30 19:22:43)
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 03:29:51PM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
>
> > As for the second problem (the empty Packages file) I was annoyed by this
> > myself for a long time and would like to get to know a use case where an
> > empty input file woul
Hi guys,
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 03:29:51PM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> As for the second problem (the empty Packages file) I was annoyed by this
> myself for a long time and would like to get to know a use case where an empty
> input file would make sense. Currently I'm working around this
Hi,
Quoting Joachim Breitner (2015-06-29 15:54:29)
> Am Montag, den 29.06.2015, 15:29 +0200 schrieb Johannes Schauer:
> > Firstly, there are two syntax errors in your Sources file. They are
> > "libghc-data-default-dev (<< = 0.6)" and "libghc-shakespeare-dev (<<
> > = 2.1)".
> > Observe how the v
Control: retitle -1 Parsing.Parse_error - improve error message
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Hi,
Am Montag, den 29.06.2015, 15:29 +0200 schrieb Johannes Schauer:
> Firstly, there are two syntax errors in your Sources file. They are
> "libghc-data-default-dev (<< = 0.6)" and "libghc-shakespeare-d
Hi,
Quoting Joachim Breitner (2015-06-29 14:17:45)
> with the attached file and an empty Packages files , I get $
> dose-builddebcheck --latest --explain --failures --deb-native-arch=amd64
> Packages Sources The applications raised this exception : Parsing.Parse_error
>
>
> I cannot see a mistak
Package: dose-builddebcheck
Version: 3.3-4
Severity: normal
File: /usr/bin/dose-builddebcheck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
with the attached file and an empty Packages files , I get
$ dose-builddebcheck --latest --explain --failures --deb-native-arch=amd64
Packages Sources
10 matches
Mail list logo
