On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 07:39:53PM -0500, David Mattli wrote:
>
> Using the latest sources from Linus's tree I built two kernels: one with
> SLAB and one with SLUB. The SLAB kernel failed "make check" and the SLUB
> kernel executed it without error. I'm not sure if it's a problem with
> SLAB or if
Curiously, 3.1.1-3 build hasn't failed on sparc64 buildd:
http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=nettle&suite=unstable
--
Best wishes,
Bob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian
onsdagen den 17 juni 2015 19.39.53 skrev David Mattli:
> Thanks for reporting this. I noticed the FTBFS log and I've been
> investigating. I was able to reproduce this build failure and also able
> to create a configuration that led to a successful build and "make
> check".
>
> Using the latest s
Thanks for reporting this. I noticed the FTBFS log and I've been
investigating. I was able to reproduce this build failure and also able
to create a configuration that led to a successful build and "make
check".
Using the latest sources from Linus's tree I built two kernels: one with
SLAB and one
Source: nettle
Version: 3.1.1-3
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
nettle FTBFS on sparc:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=nettle&arch=sparc&ver=3.1.1-3&stamp=1434370590
It seems that the test suite fails.
This affects the Haskell transition, so I’
5 matches
Mail list logo