Hello Dominic,
Dominic Hargreaves [2015-06-15 22:58 +0100]:
> Something to satisfy my original use case where I simply run adt-run
> against all the packages I'm interested in, and only the ones with
> 'validated' tests actually run.
Ah, ok -- then grep-dctrl'ing for all packages with "Testsuite:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 07:16:03PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello Dominic,
>
> Dominic Hargreaves [2015-06-15 14:32 +0100]:
> > I thought about 'no autodep8', but the semantics aren't quite correct,
> > since a package could declare Testsuite: autopkgtest, but rely on the
> > autodep8 behaviour
Hello Dominic,
Dominic Hargreaves [2015-06-15 14:32 +0100]:
> I thought about 'no autodep8', but the semantics aren't quite correct,
> since a package could declare Testsuite: autopkgtest, but rely on the
> autodep8 behaviour.
Right, that happens all the time with perl/ruby, as Nico and Antonio
p
Antonio Terceiro [2015-06-15 14:01 -0300]:
> - autopkgtest does not care (or didn't, until recently) about the value
> of the Testsuite: field; if you give it a package, it will try to run
> tests for it.
That hasn't changed, isn't planned, and wouldn't make much sense for
autopkgtest itself.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 04:48:11PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 02:32:28PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 07:30:34AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
>
> > > So to clarify, you want an option to disable autodep8, right? If a
> > > source package doesn't
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 02:32:28PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 07:30:34AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > So to clarify, you want an option to disable autodep8, right? If a
> > source package doesn't have tests and autodep8 does not generate any
> > either, then adt-ru
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 07:30:34AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello Dominic,
Hello,
Thank you for your reply (and indeed your prompt implementation).
> Dominic Hargreaves [2015-06-14 0:18 +0100]:
> > To allow test execution environments to discover packages which provide
> > tests, their s
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello again,
Dominic Hargreaves [2015-06-14 0:18 +0100]:
> Please could adt-run have an option to exit without running any tests
> if the source package in question doesn't define any?
Added in
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/autopkgtest/autopkgtest.git/commit/?id=6cf
Hello Dominic,
Dominic Hargreaves [2015-06-14 0:18 +0100]:
> To allow test execution environments to discover packages which provide
> tests, their source packages should have a ``Testsuite:`` header
> containing ``autopkgtest`` (which is currently the only defined value).
> Multiple valu
Package: autopkgtest
Version: 3.14.3
Severity: wishlist
README.package-tests.rst.gz says:
To allow test execution environments to discover packages which provide
tests, their source packages should have a ``Testsuite:`` header
containing ``autopkgtest`` (which is currently the only defined
10 matches
Mail list logo
