Bug#787003: virtualbox: VM fails to start

2015-05-28 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Control: unmerge 787003 thanks So I don't know... You might try a newer release from unstable, the upcoming 5.0 beta4 (you can grab it from our git, and checkout the experimental branch), or report it upstream. the problem is likely not Debian specific. cheers, G. Il Giovedì 28 Maggio 2

Bug#787003: virtualbox: VM fails to start

2015-05-28 Thread Björn Siebke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey Gianfranco, sorry to disappoint you, but I think it's not a dupe. As far as I can see, that would mean changing the 3D acceleration status fixes my problem, right? But this doesn't change anything. Greets Björn -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Versi

Bug#787003: virtualbox: VM fails to start

2015-05-28 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Control: tags -1 -pending Control: severity -1 important thanks I forgot to push links for the DebOMatic ongoing builds: http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#experimental/virtualbox/5.0.0~beta4-dfsg-1/buildlog http://debomatic-i386.debian.net/distribution#experimental/virtualbox/5.0.0~b

Bug#787003: virtualbox: VM fails to start

2015-05-28 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Control: forcemerge -1 763610 thanks Hi Ritesh, nope, this is actually a dupe of 763610 and launchpad 1307093. It is tracked as upstream issue 11938, can you please test virtualbox from unstable or the upcoming 5.0.0beta4 from DebOMatic (I uploaded it a few seconds ago) Relevant links https

Bug#787003: virtualbox: VM fails to start

2015-05-27 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Control: tag -1 +pending Control: merge -1 785689 We believe this is related to 785689, which is pending an upload in the coming week. virtualbox (4.3.18-dfsg-3+deb8u3) jessie; urgency=medium * d/p/39-crash-raw-mode.patch fix crash in raw mode. (Closes: #785689) from upstream changeset 53

Bug#787003: virtualbox: VM fails to start

2015-05-27 Thread Björn Siebke
Package: virtualbox Version: 4.3.18-dfsg-3 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? After having some kernel module issues, I successfully created a new VM. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? I then started the VM for th