Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 12.05.2015, 06:52 + schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna:
> Hi Joachim, since this bug is already there in jessie, it doesn't appear as a
> regression, hence
> it doesn't prevent testing migration.
> If I'm correct, your intent is to let 7.8 migrate, and this isn't a blocker.
Y
Control: severity -1 serious
Hi Joachim, since this bug is already there in jessie, it doesn't appear as a
regression, hence
it doesn't prevent testing migration.
If I'm correct, your intent is to let 7.8 migrate, and this isn't a blocker.
In my opinion this still is an RC (for Stretch), hence
Control: severity -1 normal
On Mon, 4 May 2015 14:53:35 + (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> As Joachim said in a mail where I requested the same thing:
>
> [1] (if correct) lists the compatibility matrix of ghc and llvm
>
> so 7.10 llvm 3.5
> 7.11 llvm 3.6
>
> [1] http://smart-cactus.o
Hi All,
As Joachim said in a mail where I requested the same thing:
[1] (if correct) lists the compatibility matrix of ghc and llvm
so 7.10 llvm 3.5
7.11 llvm 3.6
[1] http://smart-cactus.org/~ben/posts/2014-11-28-state-of-llvm-backend.html
cheers,
Gianfranco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
Hi,
Am Montag, den 04.05.2015, 15:39 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
> Your package builds against llvm-toolchain-3.4, which is scheduled for
> removal, see #783516). Please build against a newer llvm toolchain, such
> as 3.5 or (if possible) 3.6.
ghc generates LLVM bytecode that is relativ
Source: ghc
Version: 7.8.4-3
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer,
Your package builds against llvm-toolchain-3.4, which is scheduled for
removal, see #783516). Please build against a newer llvm toolchain, such
as 3.5 or (if possible) 3.6.
Thanks,
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-d
6 matches
Mail list logo
