Bug#780935: RFS: bakefile/1.2.5.1-1 [ITP]

2015-03-22 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Riley Baird wrote: > Since it's a precompiled version of antlr, without source, does this > change anything? Indeed, the precompiled parts that are missing source will have to be removed. Please also ask upstream to ship pristine source tarballs and ship precompil

Bug#780935: RFS: bakefile/1.2.5.1-1 [ITP]

2015-03-22 Thread Riley Baird
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 16:28:08 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote: > On 22-03-15 06:39, Riley Baird wrote: > > -The upstream tarball contains embedded code copies of the java > > version of antlr, which violates Debian policy. > > This depends on the license, but in general this statement is not > completely

Bug#780935: RFS: bakefile/1.2.5.1-1 [ITP]

2015-03-22 Thread Paul Gevers
On 22-03-15 06:39, Riley Baird wrote: > -The upstream tarball contains embedded code copies of the java > version of antlr, which violates Debian policy. This depends on the license, but in general this statement is not completely true. > You'll need to repack > the tarball and add +ds to the ver

Bug#780935: RFS: bakefile/1.2.5.1-1 [ITP]

2015-03-21 Thread Riley Baird
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bakefile" That's great! I'm not a DD, so I can't sponsor your package, but here's my overview: General: -The upstream tarball contains embedded code copies of the java version of antlr, which violates Debian policy. You'll need to repack the tarball an

Bug#780935: RFS: bakefile/1.2.5.1-1 [ITP]

2015-03-21 Thread Aleš Křivák
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bakefile" * Package name: bakefile Version : 1.2.5.1-1 Upstream Author : Vaclav Slavik * URL : http://bakefile.org/ * License : MIT Section