Bug#775155: Should provide -cc alternative

2016-01-28 Thread Sebastian Reichel
Package: src:gcc-defaults Followup-For: Bug #775155 Hi, It seems, that the transition from cross-gcc-defaults to gcc-defaults removed support for the alternatives entries. -- Sebastian

Bug#775155: Should provide -cc alternative

2015-08-27 Thread Ryan Tandy
This seems to already be fixed in unstable. Should the bug be closed? cross-gcc-defaults (0.6) unstable; urgency=medium * Add alternatives entries for crosstools (Closes: #775155) thanks, Ryan

Bug#775155: Should provide -cc alternative

2015-01-12 Thread Wookey
+++ Elliott Mitchell [2015-01-11 19:02 -0800]: > Package: src:cross-gcc-defaults > Version: 0.4 > > The SSIA pretty much. > > In addition to providing /usr/bin/-gcc, the GCC > cross-compiler packages should be providing a > /usr/bin/-cc alternative. This is similar to a native > compiler's /usr/

Bug#775155: Should provide -cc alternative

2015-01-11 Thread Elliott Mitchell
Package: src:cross-gcc-defaults Version: 0.4 The SSIA pretty much. In addition to providing /usr/bin/-gcc, the GCC cross-compiler packages should be providing a /usr/bin/-cc alternative. This is similar to a native compiler's /usr/bin/cc alternative, but for cross-compilers. I haven't yet heard