Control: tags -1 wontfix
On 2015-01-06 23:25, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please allow libjpeg9 back in jessie.
>
> The removal of libjpeg9 implies the removal of libjpeg-progs
> whi
On Wed, 04 Feb 2015, Bill Allombert wrote:
> My understanding was and is still that the CTTE overrided the release
> team on this point.
That's incorrect. At least recently, when the CTTE is overriding people,
we have been very explicit about the fact that they are being
overridden. [This is impor
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 09:28:18PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 08:54:16PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > I am sorry you feel that way. I assumed that you were aware, given that
> > you replied to the tech-ctte decision in which our statement was
> > included (in fact, y
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 08:54:16PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I am sorry you feel that way. I assumed that you were aware, given that
> you replied to the tech-ctte decision in which our statement was
> included (in fact, you retained it in quoted part of your reply).
My understanding was and
On 2015-02-04 20:54, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I believe this makes sense, as decision of the release only affects
> testing. Accordingly, there is nothing preventing multiple
> implementations of libjpeg in testing or unstable.
Sorry, I made a mistake here. That last part should have read:
"Accor
On 2015-02-02 00:04, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 08:02:38AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> I am afraid I do not see how removing libjpeg9 from testing is
>> inconsistent with the tech-ctte decision.
>
> You need to reread the full decision in context.
>
>> The very first item
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 08:02:38AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I am afraid I do not see how removing libjpeg9 from testing is
> inconsistent with the tech-ctte decision.
You need to reread the full decision in context.
> The very first item of their
> resolution text states that:
>
> 1. [...
On 2015-01-29 20:40, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 08:32:58PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> [...]
>> I am still not convinced that this is sufficient to turn over the
>> decision to only have one libjpeg implementation in Jessie.
>
> The two previous Debian releases had several
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 08:32:58PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> On 2015-01-28 00:34, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 08:02:38AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Could you list the features that the turbo-variant is missing, which are
>
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2015-01-28 00:34, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 08:02:38AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Could you list the features that the turbo-variant is missing, which are
>> present in the current version of libjpeg-progs from Wheezy? Are there
>>
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 08:02:38AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could you list the features that the turbo-variant is missing, which are
> present in the current version of libjpeg-progs from Wheezy? Are there
> any lacking features beyond the "SmartScale" feature?
Yes, there are a numb
On 2015-01-22 19:15, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 05:39:46PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Hi Bill,
>>
>> Please forgive me if I misunderstood something; I was not too involved
>> in the libjpeg transition.
>>
>> It is my understanding that there is all utilities / services prov
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 05:39:46PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> Please forgive me if I misunderstood something; I was not too involved
> in the libjpeg transition.
>
> It is my understanding that there is all utilities / ser
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2015-01-06 23:25, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please allow libjpeg9 back in jessie.
>
> The removal of libjpeg9 implies the removal of libjpeg-progs
> wh
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please allow libjpeg9 back in jessie.
The removal of libjpeg9 implies the removal of libjpeg-progs
which is in wheezy and used by a number of users, thus it
is not unused. It would be disru
15 matches
Mail list logo
