control: fixed -1 1:20190801~dfsg-1
On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 12:33:54 +0700
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
> So, all differences are clear to me now. :-)
Sounds good :)
Thanks for your detailed reply!
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.org/iijmio-mail.jp
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 11:58 AM Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
wrote:
> By dumping TTX with 'ttx' command from fonttools,
> the differences appear to be:
> 1) the "checkSumAdjustment" in
> 2) the "flags" in : "0010 0001" -> " 0001"
> 3) the "fontDirectionHint" in : "0" -> "
On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 11:54 PM Hideki Yamane wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Sep 2019 12:35:07 +0700 Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
> wrote:
> > However, as there have already been three 2019 releases (March, April,
> > August),
> > updating from official release could be another choice.
>
> Could you try to
reproducible font modification time
Message-Id: <2019015420.1a5a24be8c24f5b668ebe...@iijmio-mail.jp>
In-Reply-To:
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi,
On Sat, 21 Sep 201
Package: fontforge
Version: 1:20170731~dfsg-1+b2
Followup-For: Bug #774274
Hi,
Just seen Vasudev's comment from the bug log.
There are three relevant commits:
1. Add GetTime function: override time(2) in case SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is set
https://github.com/fontforge/fontforge/commit/4e850c13420
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan writes:
> Package: fontforge
> Version: 1:20170731~dfsg-1
> Followup-For: Bug #774274
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> This bug still exists for Type 1 font generation, which causes my package
> fonts-sipa-arundina to be unreproducible.
>
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/
Package: fontforge
Version: 1:20170731~dfsg-1
Followup-For: Bug #774274
Dear Maintainer,
This bug still exists for Type 1 font generation, which causes my package
fonts-sipa-arundina to be unreproducible.
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/diffoscope-results/fonts
Justin Cappos writes:
> found 774274
> forwarded 774274 https://github.com/fontforge/fontforge/issues/2490
> done
>
> The changelog doesn't seem to indicate that the upstream patch was
> applied. This seems to be fixed in upstream master on November 16th, 2016
> as per ( https://github.com/fontf
found 774274
forwarded 774274 https://github.com/fontforge/fontforge/issues/2490
done
The changelog doesn't seem to indicate that the upstream patch was
applied. This seems to be fixed in upstream master on November 16th, 2016
as per ( https://github.com/fontforge/fontforge/issues/2490 ).
This m
9 matches
Mail list logo
