Bug#773229: [PATCH] potential fix for #773229

2015-07-10 Thread Philip Hands
Cyril Brulebois writes: > (Currently looking at flagged mails/proposed patches.) > > Steve McIntyre (2015-06-02): >> Looks good to me... > > Steve, Philip, feel free to push/upload as/when you see fit. Done. So, should we actually not close the bug, or open a new one directly mentioning the pr

Bug#773229: [PATCH] potential fix for #773229

2015-07-09 Thread Cyril Brulebois
(Currently looking at flagged mails/proposed patches.) Steve McIntyre (2015-06-02): > Looks good to me... Steve, Philip, feel free to push/upload as/when you see fit. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#773229: [PATCH] potential fix for #773229

2015-06-02 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:54:32PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote: >As mentioned in the original report, the *boot? devices apparently >read-only and as such should not be in the list in the first place, so >this fix masks the presumed bug in parted_devices.c:process_device > >I don't suppose that it re

Bug#773229: [PATCH] potential fix for #773229

2015-05-20 Thread Philip Hands
As mentioned in the original report, the *boot? devices apparently read-only and as such should not be in the list in the first place, so this fix masks the presumed bug in parted_devices.c:process_device I don't suppose that it really matters though, since we'll just be left filtering out a devic