Bug#748728: Bug#772679: unblock: libuser/1:0.60~dfsg-1.1

2014-12-23 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On Sun, 21 Dec 2014 20:23:17 -0600 Brad Bosch wrote: > I've not chimed in on this yet because I haven't had much time to research > the history or use of libuser (and I still haven't, really). > > But I'd like to point out... > > The id-utils package has been part of Debian for almost as long as D

Bug#748728: Bug#772679: unblock: libuser/1:0.60~dfsg-1.1

2014-12-21 Thread Brad Bosch
I've not chimed in on this yet because I haven't had much time to research the history or use of libuser (and I still haven't, really). But I'd like to point out... The id-utils package has been part of Debian for almost as long as Debian existed. It is a rather old official GNU package (for wha

Bug#748728: Bug#772679: unblock: libuser/1:0.60~dfsg-1.1

2014-12-21 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: > Because that's not what policy says Conflicts is for. If typing 'lid' > runs an entirely different command depending on the phase of the moon, > we've done something wrong, and we should fix it. It's quite possible > the least disruptive o

Bug#748728: Bug#772679: unblock: libuser/1:0.60~dfsg-1.1

2014-12-21 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote: > Here is a proposal, rename "lid" in id-utils to "qid". Here is the logic: Also, no other package provides a "qid" binary in any of the bin dirs. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org wi

Bug#748728: Bug#772679: unblock: libuser/1:0.60~dfsg-1.1

2014-12-11 Thread Micha Lenk
Hi all, Am 10.12.2014 um 17:39 schrieb Julien Cristau: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 13:41:13 +0100, Micha Lenk wrote: >> Julien, could you please elaborate why we can't have the 'lid' >> command be shipped both by libuser and id-utils (as you stated in >> 748728#34) *even if* a Conflicts: dependency

Bug#748728: Bug#772679: unblock: libuser/1:0.60~dfsg-1.1

2014-12-10 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 13:41:13 +0100, Micha Lenk wrote: > Control: tags 772679 - wontfix > Control: reopen 772679 > > Hi Ivo, > > Am 10.12.2014 um 10:40 schrieb Ivo De Decker: > >> + * Add Conflict: id-utils to libuser (closes: #748728). > > > > It was clearly mentioned in > > https://bugs.d

Bug#748728: Bug#772679: unblock: libuser/1:0.60~dfsg-1.1

2014-12-10 Thread Micha Lenk
Control: tags 772679 - wontfix Control: reopen 772679 Hi Ivo, Am 10.12.2014 um 10:40 schrieb Ivo De Decker: >> + * Add Conflict: id-utils to libuser (closes: #748728). > > It was clearly mentioned in > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=748728#34 that this change > is not accepta

Bug#772679: unblock: libuser/1:0.60~dfsg-1.1

2014-12-09 Thread Micha Lenk
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package libuser The version just uploaded to unstable fixes the RC bug #748728. diff -Nru libuser-0.60~dfsg/debian/changelog libuser-0.60~dfsg/debian/changelog --- libuser-0