On jeu., 2014-12-11 at 09:35 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> >
> > Ansgar: will it not be an issue to have both debian.tar.{gz,xz} in the
> > archive?
>
> No, the second .debian.tar.* is not kept: it's referenced by the
> .changes so dak verifies that it's included in the upload, but then gets
>
Hi,
Yves-Alexis Perez writes:
> I guess Ansgar put the debian.tar.xz at the right place, the processing
> was successful in the end.
>
> Ansgar: will it not be an issue to have both debian.tar.{gz,xz} in the
> archive?
No, the second .debian.tar.* is not kept: it's referenced by the
.changes so
On mer., 2014-12-10 at 17:38 -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > [23:26] < ansgar> As the .dsc looks right (it only has one), the uploader
> > can just fix the .changes and upload to ftp-master. Or give me the missing
> > .debian.tar.*.
> >
> > Can you do one of the b
Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> [23:26] < ansgar> As the .dsc looks right (it only has one), the uploader can
> just fix the .changes and upload to ftp-master. Or give me the missing
> .debian.tar.*.
>
> Can you do one of the both approaches?
Hi,
The .debian.tar.* files are available here:
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:20:36PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:59:20PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> >
> > [WB-team: we have an issue with the unbound amd64 build for DSA 3097-1,
> > so I'm adding you to the loop, see below]
> >
> > On mer., 2014-12-10 at 16:46
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:59:20PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>
> [WB-team: we have an issue with the unbound amd64 build for DSA 3097-1,
> so I'm adding you to the loop, see below]
>
> On mer., 2014-12-10 at 16:46 -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> > Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > Thanks. Altho
[WB-team: we have an issue with the unbound amd64 build for DSA 3097-1,
so I'm adding you to the loop, see below]
On mer., 2014-12-10 at 16:46 -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > Thanks. Although it seems your _multi.changes might have issue. How
> > exactly did you made i
Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Thanks. Although it seems your _multi.changes might have issue. How
> exactly did you made it? It apparently references twice the debian
> changes:
>
> b05bf69385554dddaa22629327ac647c384c1585 15413
> unbound_1.4.17-3+deb7u2.debian.tar.gz
> d4addd58c211ff20d707e52d961be
On mer., 2014-12-10 at 10:40 -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On mar., 2014-12-09 at 18:46 -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> > > Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > > For Wheezy you need to build with -sa (since it's the first security
> > > > upload) and target wheezy-security d
Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On mar., 2014-12-09 at 18:46 -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> > Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > For Wheezy you need to build with -sa (since it's the first security
> > > upload) and target wheezy-security distribution. Then you send us the
> > > debdiff so we can have a qui
On mar., 2014-12-09 at 18:46 -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > For Wheezy you need to build with -sa (since it's the first security
> > upload) and target wheezy-security distribution. Then you send us the
> > debdiff so we can have a quick check, and after our ACK you can
Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> For Wheezy you need to build with -sa (since it's the first security
> upload) and target wheezy-security distribution. Then you send us the
> debdiff so we can have a quick check, and after our ACK you can upload
> to security-master and we release the DSA.
OK, see atta
Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as you may already know, a vulnerability in several recursive DNS
> implementations (bind, pdns-recursor and unbound, maybe others) has been
> found by a research.
>
> For unbound, it has been assigned CVE-2014-8602 and more information can
> be found on the mai
Source: unbound
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Hi,
as you may already know, a vulnerability in several recursive DNS
implementations (bind, pdns-recursor and unbound, maybe others) has been
found by a research.
For unbound, it has been assigned CVE-2014-8602 and
14 matches
Mail list logo
