Bug#771208: unblock: busybox/1:1.22.0-14

2015-02-27 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Control: retitle -1 unblock: busybox/1:1.22.0-9+deb8u1 Control: tag -1 confirmed Ivo De Decker (2015-02-21): > Control: tags -1 - moreinfo > Control: tags -1 d-i > > Hi, > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:30:50PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > > I just did so and uploaded 1:1.22.0-9+deb8u1 to t-

Bug#771208: unblock: busybox/1:1.22.0-14

2015-02-21 Thread Ivo De Decker
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Control: tags -1 d-i Hi, On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:30:50PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > I just did so and uploaded 1:1.22.0-9+deb8u1 to t-p-u. I unblocked it, but it needs a d-i ack. > Please push both your jessie branch and tag to git. This probably counts as

Bug#771208: unblock: busybox/1:1.22.0-14

2015-02-18 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Mehdi Dogguy (2015-02-18): > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:30:50PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois > wrote: > > Please push both your jessie branch and tag to git. > > I don't have write access to d-i repos. Wrong. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#771208: unblock: busybox/1:1.22.0-14

2015-02-18 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:30:50PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Mehdi Dogguy (2015-02-18): > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 08:52:05AM +0100, Ivo De Decker > > wrote: > > > > > > Could you do a new upload with only the security fix? > > > > > > > I just did so and uploaded 1:1.22.0-9+deb8u1 t

Bug#771208: unblock: busybox/1:1.22.0-14

2015-02-18 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Mehdi Dogguy (2015-02-18): > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 08:52:05AM +0100, Ivo De Decker > wrote: > > > > Could you do a new upload with only the security fix? > > > > I just did so and uploaded 1:1.22.0-9+deb8u1 to t-p-u. Please push both your jessie branch and tag to git. Mraw, KiBi. signat

Bug#771208: unblock: busybox/1:1.22.0-14

2015-02-18 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 08:52:05AM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote: > > Could you do a new upload with only the security fix? > I just did so and uploaded 1:1.22.0-9+deb8u1 to t-p-u. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Bug#771208: unblock: busybox/1:1.22.0-14

2014-12-11 Thread Diederik de Haas
On Thursday 11 December 2014 08:52:05 Ivo De Decker wrote: > > > #768876 is tagged jessie-ignore so I'm really unconvinced by the > > > debian/rules changes. > > > > It is jessie-ignore just to be non-RC. The fun with static linking > > and bugs it discovered shows that proper Built-Using field is

Bug#771208: unblock: busybox/1:1.22.0-14

2014-12-11 Thread Michael Tokarev
11.12.2014 13:02, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, Hello > can you please still push your master branch and tags to the git > repository? Last commit there points to debian/1.22.0-9 which is > 5 revisions old, at least if I'm reading cgit and gitk properly. Oh yeah. I'm sorry about that. Pushed no

Bug#771208: unblock: busybox/1:1.22.0-14

2014-12-11 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Michael Tokarev (2014-12-11): > 11.12.2014 10:52, Ivo De Decker wrote: > [] > > As the libc issue with the static binary seems to be fixed in the libc > > version > > in both jessie and sid, the only remaining issue is the missing build-using, > > which can wait till after jessie. > > > > Could

Bug#771208: unblock: busybox/1:1.22.0-14

2014-12-11 Thread Michael Tokarev
11.12.2014 10:52, Ivo De Decker wrote: [] > As the libc issue with the static binary seems to be fixed in the libc version > in both jessie and sid, the only remaining issue is the missing build-using, > which can wait till after jessie. > > Could you do a new upload with only the security fix? I

Bug#771208: unblock: busybox/1:1.22.0-14

2014-12-10 Thread Ivo De Decker
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Michael, On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 07:08:49PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: > > #768876 is tagged jessie-ignore so I'm really unconvinced by the > > debian/rules changes. > > It is jessie-ignore just to be non-RC. The fun with static linking > and bugs it discovered s

Bug#771208: unblock: busybox/1:1.22.0-14

2014-12-04 Thread Diederik de Haas
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:00:03 +0100 Cyril Brulebois wrote: > (Putting on my d-i RM fedora.) > > #768876 is tagged jessie-ignore so I'm really unconvinced by the > debian/rules changes. > > At this stage, I'd rather see the security fix only. Wouldn't that entail that #769190 would NOT be fixed f

Bug#771208: unblock: busybox/1:1.22.0-14

2014-11-27 Thread Michael Tokarev
27.11.2014 19:00, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > (Putting on my d-i RM fedora.) Thank you for your review. > Michael Tokarev (2014-11-27): >> Please unblock package busybox. Last upload has one security bugfix >> (CVE-2014-4607, #768945), the fix is from upstream stable branch, >> fixing an integer o

Bug#771208: unblock: busybox/1:1.22.0-14

2014-11-27 Thread Cyril Brulebois
(Putting on my d-i RM fedora.) Michael Tokarev (2014-11-27): > Please unblock package busybox. Last upload has one security bugfix > (CVE-2014-4607, #768945), the fix is from upstream stable branch, > fixing an integer overflow in lzo decompressor; it adds a Built-Using > control field for busyb

Bug#771208: unblock: busybox/1:1.22.0-14

2014-11-27 Thread Michael Tokarev
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package busybox. Last upload has one security bugfix (CVE-2014-4607, #768945), the fix is from upstream stable branch, fixing an integer overflow in lzo decompressor; it adds