On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 06:32:55PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> It would solve the question "Which package is responsible for removing
> that line from /etc/nsswicth.conf?" with "NONE."
> This action is problematic if there is more than one package
> using/adding/modifying this line.
Even if s
reassign 770825 libsss-sudo
thanks
There should not be a sudoers line by default.
The current lines in /etc/nsswitch.conf are there by default because
they come from glibc, which is always present.
The proposed line, AFAIK, has only effect when the libsss-sudo package
is installed. Otherwise it
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 11:41:23 +0100 (CET) Santiago Vila
wrote:
> In either case, packages modifying this file should leave it in the
> same state as before, be it the default from base-files, or the default
> from another package that also modified the file before, so I don't
> see how adding the l
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> Package: base-files
> Version: 7.10
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> libsss-sudo and sudo-ldap (at least) modify nsswitch.conf in their
> postinst, adding 'sudoers: files $foo' to it. The problem is that on
> purge they'd need to remove the entry complet
Package: base-files
Version: 7.10
Severity: normal
Hi,
libsss-sudo and sudo-ldap (at least) modify nsswitch.conf in their postinst,
adding 'sudoers: files $foo' to it. The problem is that on purge they'd need to
remove the entry completely so that piuparts doesn't fail, but that might break
oth
5 matches
Mail list logo
