On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 11:29:32 +0100 "Beck, Andre" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> isn't that a bug in e2fsck anyway? There is accept_time_fudge which
> defaults to true and should take care of this situation.
Possibly; in any case it still logs a warning even when it 'accepts' the
incorrect time. I don't know
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 03:14:53 +0100 Ben Hutchings
wrote:
> By the way, Lennart Poettering told me that other distributions have
> done that, though I haven't checked whether it is done with a
> configuration file or a patch to the code.
>
> > it wouldn't be better to just skip the fsck of / (and /u
Am 31.03.2015 um 04:14 schrieb Ben Hutchings:
> On Sun, 2015-03-29 at 04:29 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 22:51:53 + Ben Hutchings
>> I was wondering, if an alternative to disabling the superblock time
>> check in e2fsprogs,
Well, it dawned to me, that doing both is proba
On Sun, 2015-03-29 at 04:29 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hi Ben!
>
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 22:51:53 + Ben Hutchings
> wrote:
> > Package: e2fsprogs
> > Version: 1.42.12-1
> > Severity: important
> > Tags: upstream
> >
> > We discussed this previously in person, but unfortunately the proposed
Michael Biebl [2015-03-29 4:29 +0200]:
> I was wondering, if an alternative to disabling the superblock time
> check in e2fsprogs, it wouldn't be better to just skip the fsck of /
> (and /usr, if separate).
> For that, initramfs-tools could create a flag file for / and /usr in
> /run and we'd upda
Hi Ben!
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 22:51:53 + Ben Hutchings
wrote:
> Package: e2fsprogs
> Version: 1.42.12-1
> Severity: important
> Tags: upstream
>
> We discussed this previously in person, but unfortunately the proposed
> solution doesn't work.
>
> The plan for jessie (yes I know it's late) is
Hi,
isn't that a bug in e2fsck anyway? There is accept_time_fudge which
defaults to true and should take care of this situation. Even when it
wouldn't default to true, my e2fsck.conf already had its alias
buggy_init_scripts set to 1. Nevertheless, I'm briefly seeing an fsck
running now on every bo
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 22:51:53 + Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
> You said that this check could be disabled in a configuration file,
> e2fsck.conf, and we can create that in the initramfs. This works in
> so far as it suppresses warnings while the initramfs code is running.
> Unfortunately, every
Package: e2fsprogs
Version: 1.42.12-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
We discussed this previously in person, but unfortunately the proposed
solution doesn't work.
The plan for jessie (yes I know it's late) is to mount and fsck the
root and (if separate) /usr filesystems from initramfs code, b
9 matches
Mail list logo
