Bug#766962: quassel: diff for NMU version 0.10.0-2.1

2014-11-05 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Felix, On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 06:45:09PM +0100, Felix Geyer wrote: > Control: reopen -1 > Control: found -1 0.11.0-1 > > Version 0.11.0 does *not* contain the commit that fixes this bug. Thanks for checking also this version! > 0.11.0-1 is also wrongly marked as fixed in the security tracker

Bug#766962: quassel: diff for NMU version 0.10.0-2.1

2014-11-05 Thread Felix Geyer
Control: reopen -1 Control: found -1 0.11.0-1 Version 0.11.0 does *not* contain the commit that fixes this bug. 0.11.0-1 is also wrongly marked as fixed in the security tracker. I guess now 0.10.0-2.1 has to be re-uploaded with a different version to testing-proposed-updates. Cheers, Felix --

Bug#766962: quassel: diff for NMU version 0.10.0-2.1

2014-11-04 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi, On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 02:57:35PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 09:46:16AM +0100, Thomas Müller wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have no plans to override your NMUs - I'll prepare an upload of > > 0.11.0 to unstable these days. > > Ok thanks! Please note that

Bug#766962: quassel: diff for NMU version 0.10.0-2.1

2014-11-03 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi, On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 09:46:16AM +0100, Thomas Müller wrote: > Hi, > > I have no plans to override your NMUs - I'll prepare an upload of > 0.11.0 to unstable these days. Ok thanks! Please note that we are shortly before the freeze, so consider to upload the new upstream version to unstable

Bug#766962: quassel: diff for NMU version 0.10.0-2.1

2014-11-03 Thread Thomas Müller
Hi, I have no plans to override your NMUs - I'll prepare an upload of 0.11.0 to unstable these days. Regards, Thomas Am Montag, den 03.11.2014 um 9:41 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso: > Hi Thomas, > > Thanks for your reply. Just a question below: > > On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 09:15:25AM +0100, T

Bug#766962: quassel: diff for NMU version 0.10.0-2.1

2014-11-03 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Thomas, Thanks for your reply. Just a question below: On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 09:15:25AM +0100, Thomas Müller wrote: > > Thanks a lot for your support on this - very much welcome! Do you plan to override my NMU in the delayed queue? If not I would like to move it straight to the archive from

Bug#766962: quassel: diff for NMU version 0.10.0-2.1

2014-11-03 Thread Thomas Müller
Thanks a lot for your support on this - very much welcome! Thomas -- Thomas Müller E-Mail: thomas.muel...@tmit.eu Am Sonntag, den 02.11.2014 um 22:44 schrieb Luciano Bello: > On Sunday 02 November 2014 19.35.34 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Note that Luciano Bello is plannin

Bug#766962: quassel: diff for NMU version 0.10.0-2.1

2014-11-02 Thread Luciano Bello
On Sunday 02 November 2014 19.35.34 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Note that Luciano Bello is planning to release a DSA for > wheezy-security too. DSA released: https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2014/msg00251.html Cheers, luciano signature.asc Description: This is a digitally sig

Bug#766962: quassel: diff for NMU version 0.10.0-2.1

2014-11-02 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Control: tags 766962 + pending Hi Thomas, I've prepared an NMU for quassel (versioned as 0.10.0-2.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Note that Luciano Bello is planning to release a DSA for wheezy-security too. Regards, Salvatore diff -Nru q