Bug#765156: flashproxy is marked for autoremoval from testing

2014-11-06 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Holger Levsen wrote (05 Nov 2014 14:40:06 GMT) : > 1. bumping the standards version now is often perceived as unwanted noise by > those reviewing the changes to decide whether to let it enter jessie. leave > it > now, but next time please only include non-cosmetic changes _if_ you add non

Bug#765156: flashproxy is marked for autoremoval from testing

2014-11-05 Thread Ximin Luo
On 05/11/14 17:01, Holger Levsen wrote: > please describe this in debian/changelog, re-upload to mentors and I'll > happily upload to sid! basically any changes should be somehow mentioned in > debian/changelog and at this time such changes certainly..! > > Thanks! > Done! https://mentors.debi

Bug#765156: flashproxy is marked for autoremoval from testing

2014-11-05 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Mittwoch, 5. November 2014, Ximin Luo wrote: > > 1. bumping the standards version now is often perceived as unwanted noise > > by those reviewing the changes to decide whether to let it enter jessie. > > leave it now, but next time please only include non-cosmetic changes > > _if_ you add n

Bug#765156: flashproxy is marked for autoremoval from testing

2014-11-05 Thread Ximin Luo
On 05/11/14 14:40, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Dienstag, 4. November 2014, Ximin Luo wrote: >> OK, I've uploaded a release candidate to mentors, same address as above. > > I took a look, and there are two or three problems, though the fix itself is > mostly fine I think :-) > > 1. bumping

Bug#765156: flashproxy is marked for autoremoval from testing

2014-11-05 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Dienstag, 4. November 2014, Ximin Luo wrote: > OK, I've uploaded a release candidate to mentors, same address as above. I took a look, and there are two or three problems, though the fix itself is mostly fine I think :-) 1. bumping the standards version now is often perceived as unwanted

Bug#765156: flashproxy is marked for autoremoval from testing

2014-11-04 Thread Ximin Luo
On 04/11/14 11:54, Holger Levsen wrote: >> Candidate for 1.7-2: >> https://mentors.debian.net/package/flashproxy >> Let me know if it works, and I'll upload a proper release. > > I wont check today or probably tomorrow anyway, I'm sick with fever atm, so > why don't you make it a release anyway a

Bug#765156: flashproxy is marked for autoremoval from testing

2014-11-04 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Dienstag, 4. November 2014, Ximin Luo wrote: > OK, so it turns out you can do this in automake easily with a flag. I've > added it to debian/rules. cool > Candidate for 1.7-2: > https://mentors.debian.net/package/flashproxy > Let me know if it works, and I'll upload a proper release. I

Bug#765156: flashproxy is marked for autoremoval from testing

2014-11-03 Thread Ximin Luo
On 02/11/14 21:33, Ximin Luo wrote: > On 01/11/14 18:41, Holger Levsen wrote: >> >> well, you are the maintainer you can make it output the test.log if there >> are >> failures... >> > > It's pretty tricky to do this and I don't want to commit a hack that bypasses > automake. I've filed a fea

Bug#765156: flashproxy is marked for autoremoval from testing

2014-11-02 Thread Ximin Luo
On 01/11/14 18:41, Holger Levsen wrote: > > well, you are the maintainer you can make it output the test.log if there are > failures... > It's pretty tricky to do this and I don't want to commit a hack that bypasses automake. I've filed a feature request upstream to automake: http://debbugs.

Bug#765156: flashproxy is marked for autoremoval from testing

2014-11-01 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Samstag, 1. November 2014, Ximin Luo wrote: > > you should send this to the bug. > It is sent to the bug. right, here we're talking... > Yes, but it gives me no actionable information. Great, my build is failing, > I can't even see the test output or the build environment. :/ well, you

Bug#765156: flashproxy is marked for autoremoval from testing

2014-11-01 Thread Ximin Luo
On 01/11/14 18:00, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Samstag, 1. November 2014, Ximin Luo wrote: >> I've so far been unable to reproduce this build failure. I've tried doing >> it through cowbuilder, disconnecting from the internet, setting >> `net.ipv6.bindv6only = 1` and `sudo sysctl -p`, and in

Bug#765156: flashproxy is marked for autoremoval from testing

2014-11-01 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Samstag, 1. November 2014, Ximin Luo wrote: > I've so far been unable to reproduce this build failure. I've tried doing > it through cowbuilder, disconnecting from the internet, setting > `net.ipv6.bindv6only = 1` and `sudo sysctl -p`, and in every case the > package builds fine. you shoul

Bug#765156: flashproxy is marked for autoremoval from testing

2014-11-01 Thread Ximin Luo
On 28/10/14 11:19, Ximin Luo wrote: > On 28/10/14 10:58, Holger Levsen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Dienstag, 28. Oktober 2014, Holger Levsen wrote: >>> FWIW, https://jenkins.debian.net/userContent/rb-pkg/flashproxy.html shows >>> that it build fine there on 2014-10-13 19:14 on amd64 too. I've scheduled

Bug#765156: flashproxy is marked for autoremoval from testing

2014-10-28 Thread Ximin Luo
On 28/10/14 10:58, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Dienstag, 28. Oktober 2014, Holger Levsen wrote: >> FWIW, https://jenkins.debian.net/userContent/rb-pkg/flashproxy.html shows >> that it build fine there on 2014-10-13 19:14 on amd64 too. I've scheduled >> another build there (should be visible

Bug#765156: flashproxy is marked for autoremoval from testing

2014-10-28 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Dienstag, 28. Oktober 2014, Holger Levsen wrote: > FWIW, https://jenkins.debian.net/userContent/rb-pkg/flashproxy.html shows > that it build fine there on 2014-10-13 19:14 on amd64 too. I've scheduled > another build there (should be visible in 15min roughly) to see if this is > still the c

Bug#765156: flashproxy is marked for autoremoval from testing

2014-10-28 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, FWIW, https://jenkins.debian.net/userContent/rb-pkg/flashproxy.html shows that it build fine there on 2014-10-13 19:14 on amd64 too. I've scheduled another build there (should be visible in 15min roughly) to see if this is still the case... cheers, Holger signature.asc Descripti