Rogério
On 4/25/20 1:57 AM, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Jul 03 2019, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> Are you still interested working on hfsprogs or do you want me to take the
>> package over? Updating to a newer version of hfsprogs is surely needed now
>> and if you are no longer interested in
Dear John Paul,
On Jul 03 2019, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Are you still interested working on hfsprogs or do you want me to take the
> package over? Updating to a newer version of hfsprogs is surely needed now
> and if you are no longer interested in maintaining the package, it would
> be
Hi Rogério!
On 2/2/19 12:39 AM, Rogério Brito wrote:
> Thanks for the pointers. I will try to work on these ASAP (including
> some at least another package of mine), since the new version that
> they may have package is sure to have many, many fixes and new
> features, compared to what we currentl
Dear John Paul,
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:13 AM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> Both Fedora and Arch are shipping a patched version 540.1 [1, 2],
> so updating to newer versions seems possible with some elbow
> grease.
> > [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hfsplus-tools/tree/master
> >
Hi Rogério!
Both Fedora and Arch are shipping a patched version 540.1 [1, 2],
so updating to newer versions seems possible with some elbow
grease.
Could you maybe import the sources from Fedora and thus update the
Debian package to version 540.1?
Thanks,
Adrian
> [1] https://src.fedoraproject.o
Good to know.
The only "Drawback" I find is that hfs (normal just plain hfs) support is
not pressent since in Mac OS X 10.6 it was moved to the kernel for
read-only support.
but that is solvable with hfsutils making it a recommendation (or just
forking and modernising it).
But just for hfs+ for me
From: Pablo Roberto Lezaeta Reyes
Date: 2017-05-19 17:11 GMT-04:00
Subject: Re: Bug#765104: Update hfsprogs to 572.1.1
To: Rogério Brito
2016-02-08 15:54 GMT-03:00 Rogério Brito :
> Hi there.
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:32 AM, Pablo Lezaeta Reyes
> wrote:
> > There is an
Hi there.
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:32 AM, Pablo Lezaeta Reyes wrote:
> There is any issue preventing at least try updating the package?
Yes. The patches don't apply, the update of a new version needs very
heavy surgery, and this is akin to the maintenance of a full-blown
fork of the package.
I
There is any issue preventing at least try updating the package?
Maybe providing more insingn in the problem could help us help you get the
apropiate update
or at least if you aren't going to update you could backport security
patchs and things.
--
*Pablo Lezaeta*
Any updates on this bug? What modifications are needed from upstream?
What impact will using an old version have on compatibility with OS X
systems?
Package: hfsprogs
Severity: normal
Hello,
hfsprogs which is derived from diskdev_cmds is very out of date vs Apple
sources. It is currently version 332.25 which was from 10.4 (~ 5-6 years
old) when upstream is up to 10.9.5 and version 572.1.1. Version 10.10 will
likely be released in a week or so
11 matches
Mail list logo
