On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 06:19:09PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Package: init
> Version: 1.34
>
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 at 13:12:42 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Before systemd arrived, it was possible to have a chroot free from
> > init packages (not needed to build packages).
>
> This was the
Control: reassign -1 general
Control: retitle -1 init should not be Essential
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:04:17 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> control: reassign -1 debootstrap
> control: retitle -1 variant=buildd should not install init systems
>
> Hi,
>
> On Montag, 13. Oktober 2014, Joey Hess w
control: reassign -1 debootstrap
control: retitle -1 variant=buildd should not install init systems
Hi,
On Montag, 13. Oktober 2014, Joey Hess wrote:
> It seems reasonable for debootstrap --variant=buildd to omit any init
> systems, if it doesn't already.
seems reasonable indeed, reassigning acc
control: reassign -1 general
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Holger Levsen (2014-10-13):
> control: reassign -1 debootstrap
> control: retitle -1 variant=buildd should not install init systems
>
> Hi,
>
> On Montag, 13. Oktober 2014, Joey Hess wrote:
> > It seems reasonable for debootstrap --variant=buildd to omit any init
> > systems, if it doesn't alrea
control: reassign -1 debootstrap
control: retitle -1 variant=buildd should not install init systems
Hi,
On Montag, 13. Oktober 2014, Joey Hess wrote:
> It seems reasonable for debootstrap --variant=buildd to omit any init
> systems, if it doesn't already.
seems reasonable indeed, reassigning acc
Hi,
Joey Hess writes:
> Santiago Vila wrote:
>> Before systemd arrived, it was possible to have a chroot free from
>> init packages (not needed to build packages).
>
> It seems reasonable for debootstrap --variant=buildd to omit any init
> systems, if it doesn't already.
It seems a bit hacky to
Santiago Vila wrote:
> Before systemd arrived, it was possible to have a chroot free from
> init packages (not needed to build packages).
It seems reasonable for debootstrap --variant=buildd to omit any init
systems, if it doesn't already.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signa
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 02:34:39PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Oct 13, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> > Oops. You are right. So this is not really a regression, only an
> > undesirable feature that we have had in the system for a long time.
> I would be happy to fix it FWIW, but I am not sure that
On Oct 13, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Oops. You are right. So this is not really a regression, only an
> undesirable feature that we have had in the system for a long time.
I would be happy to fix it FWIW, but I am not sure that there is
a way to do it outside of debootstrap which will not cause mor
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 01:43:29PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> In Wheezy, sysvinit was essential, so you would have the same issue in
> stable (just with a different init system).
Oops. You are right. So this is not really a regression, only an
undesirable feature that we have had in the system
On 2014-10-13 13:12, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Package: general
>
> Before systemd arrived, it was possible to have a chroot free from
> init packages (not needed to build packages).
>
> [...]
>
> In either case, the end result is that I'm forced to install init
> packages in a chroot which is used
Package: general
Before systemd arrived, it was possible to have a chroot free from
init packages (not needed to build packages).
Now if I do "apt-get dist-upgrade" inside a minimal chroot (using
schroot here), I get this:
The following NEW packages will be installed:
acl adduser dmsetup init
13 matches
Mail list logo
