Hi Laurent,
Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Yes that file could be used as a base, the [Install] section should
> be removed and the display-manager.service should be created at
> installation time by the postinst script.
>
> The update_wdm_wmlist script should also maybe called in a
> ExecStartPre=
Control: severity -1 serious
Hi Laurent,
Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> I set the severity as serious as gdm has now removed the hack in the
> .service file to not start gdm if an other DM without a .service
> file is installed.
You should have mentioned that in your first mail. That's indeed a
goo
Le 08/10/17 à 13:52, Axel Beckert a écrit :
Hi again,
Laurent Bigonville wrote:
WDM is the last DM to not provided a .service file and the needed
display-manager.service symlink
Thanks for that hint. This implies that xdm (which shares the same
roots as wdm) has a (hopefully working) .service
Hi again,
Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> WDM is the last DM to not provided a .service file and the needed
> display-manager.service symlink
Thanks for that hint. This implies that xdm (which shares the same
roots as wdm) has a (hopefully working) .service file. Will use that
as a pattern as I doubt
Control: severity -1 important
Hi Laurent,
Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> This should be fixed for buster IMVHO
While I agree with this, I don't agree with the severity.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.
severity 761642 serious
thanks
Hi,
WDM is the last DM to not provided a .service file and the needed
display-manager.service symlink
This should be fixed for buster IMVHO
Regards,
Laurent Bigonville
Package: wdm
Version: 1.28-17
Severity: wishlist
Since the following information is helpful when a .service file for
wdm is created, but #761236 is already closed, I'm creating a new bug
report tracking this.
Here's the mail, Agustin kindly sent to #761236:
- Forwarded message from Agustin M
7 matches
Mail list logo
