Bug#760884: RFS: astroquery/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

2014-09-14 Thread Ole Streicher
Am 14.09.2014 um 18:23 schrieb Vincent Prat: >> E: astroquery source: source-is-missing >> astroquery/splatalogue/data/species.json >> P: astroquery source: source-contains-prebuilt-javascript-object >> astroquery/splatalogue/data/species.json means line length is about 16184 >> characters >> >>

Bug#760884: RFS: astroquery/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

2014-09-14 Thread Vincent Prat
Hi Ole, I tried with 0.4.2 and could build it without the error. However, I still get the following lintian error (and pedantic warning): E: astroquery source: source-is-missing astroquery/splatalogue/data/species.json P: astroquery source: source-contains-prebuilt-javascript-object astroquery

Bug#760884: RFS: astroquery/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

2014-09-14 Thread Vincent Prat
Hi Ole, Agreed and modified. Best regards, Vincent Le 14/09/2014 16:23, Ole Streicher a écrit : -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Vincent, one more point: I just discovered that you changed the license of the debian files to GPL-3+. While it is ofcourse your own choice (and I

Bug#760884: RFS: astroquery/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

2014-09-14 Thread Ole Streicher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Vincent, one more point: I just discovered that you changed the license of the debian files to GPL-3+. While it is ofcourse your own choice (and I will sponsor it independently of your decision here), I would recommend to stay with upstream's BS

Bug#760884: RFS: astroquery/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

2014-09-14 Thread Gijs Molenaar
casacore data is this page: ftp://ftp.atnf.csiro.au/pub/software/measures_data/measures_data.tar.bz2 linked from this page: https://code.google.com/p/casacore/wiki/BuildInstructions According to astron is updated weekly, but in practice that is not the case. The people at astron use measures_d

Bug#760884: RFS: astroquery/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

2014-09-14 Thread Ole Streicher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Vincent, Am 13.09.2014 um 22:57 schrieb Vincent Prat: > I have applied all suggested changes. OK. > I thought the package was ready, but while testing it with pbuilder, I > encountered an error, apparently with astropy-helpers documentation > r

Bug#760884: RFS: astroquery/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

2014-09-14 Thread Ole Streicher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 14.09.2014 um 10:49 schrieb Gijs Molenaar: > Maybe one step back, why does casacore-data depend on casacore? It is just > some data that could be used without casacore itself right? Why not remove > the dependency? The reason is that you need to bu

Bug#760884: RFS: astroquery/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

2014-09-14 Thread Gijs Molenaar
Hi all, Maybe one step back, why does casacore-data depend on casacore? It is just some data that could be used without casacore itself right? Why not remove the dependency? greetings, - Gijs 2014-09-14 8:22 GMT+02:00 Andrey Rahmatullin : > On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 10:57:16PM +0200, Vincent Pr

Bug#760884: RFS: astroquery/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

2014-09-14 Thread Ole Streicher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Vincent, Am 13.09.2014 um 22:57 schrieb Vincent Prat: > I thought the package was ready, but while testing it with pbuilder, I > encountered an error, apparently with astropy-helpers documentation > routines: > > Exception occurred: >File >

Bug#760884: RFS: astroquery/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

2014-09-13 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 10:57:16PM +0200, Vincent Prat wrote: > >>* I would put the http_proxy='127.0.0.1:9' as general line in rules, > >> to make sure that during auto-build nothing is retrieved (move from > >> the sphinx documentation) pybuild already does that for commands it runs. -- WBR

Bug#760884: RFS: astroquery/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

2014-09-13 Thread Vincent Prat
Hi Ole, I have applied all suggested changes. I thought the package was ready, but while testing it with pbuilder, I encountered an error, apparently with astropy-helpers documentation routines: Exception occurred: File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/astropy_helpers/sphinx/ext/automodsu

Bug#760884: RFS: astroquery/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

2014-09-13 Thread Vincent Prat
Hi As that tag exists, and effectively breaks the uscan... why not just use pypi as the source for the watch file. I had to do this for a package I maintain due to lack of tags, you can see my watch file at [1] That is what is done now. Regards, Vincent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs

Bug#760884: RFS: astroquery/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

2014-09-13 Thread Daniel Lintott
On 13/09/14 20:05, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > Yes, looks like upstream broke their git repo. That tag and commits in it > are not a part of any branch and the version is probably related to the > version of -helpers. Unfortunately in DVCS there is no way to remove > things you've published, even i

Bug#760884: RFS: astroquery/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

2014-09-13 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 08:36:42PM +0200, Vincent Prat wrote: > Hi, > >wrar@belkar ~/tmp/astroquery-0.2.1 $ uscan --verbose --report > >-- Scanning for watchfiles in . > >-- Found watchfile in ./debian > >-- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line: > > > > opts=filenamemangle=s/.+\/v?(\d\S*)

Bug#760884: RFS: astroquery/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

2014-09-13 Thread Vincent Prat
Hi, wrar@belkar ~/tmp/astroquery-0.2.1 $ uscan --verbose --report -- Scanning for watchfiles in . -- Found watchfile in ./debian -- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line: opts=filenamemangle=s/.+\/v?(\d\S*)\.tar\.gz/astroquery-$1\.tar\.gz/,uversionmangle=s/(\d)[_\.\-\+]?((RC|rc|pre|dev|

Bug#760884: RFS: astroquery/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

2014-09-13 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 11:46:53AM +0200, Vincent Prat wrote: > Hi Andrey, > > Thank you for the review. > >The latest version is 0.4. > Where have you found this? On both Pypi and Github, the latest release is > 0.2.2. wrar@belkar ~/tmp/astroquery-0.2.1 $ uscan --verbose --report

Bug#760884: Aw: Bug#760884: RFS: astroquery/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

2014-09-13 Thread Steffen Möller
Hello, > Thank you for the review. > > The latest version is 0.4. > Where have you found this? On both Pypi and Github, the latest release > is 0.2.2. The commment may refer to astropy, which is at 0.4.1. That is an associated project but not shipping astroquery itself. For astroquery, astropy p

Bug#760884: RFS: astroquery/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

2014-09-13 Thread Vincent Prat
Hi Andrey, Thank you for the review. The latest version is 0.4. Where have you found this? On both Pypi and Github, the latest release is 0.2.2. Please add a .patch extension to the patch file name. You should add information for debian/* to debian/copyright. Is it really necessary to rm astro

Bug#760884: RFS: astroquery/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

2014-09-13 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 11:20:00PM +0200, Vincent Prat wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "astroquery" > > * Package name: astroquery >Version : 0.2.1-1 >Upstream Author : Adam Ginsb

Bug#760884: RFS: astroquery/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

2014-09-08 Thread Vincent Prat
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "astroquery" * Package name: astroquery Version : 0.2.1-1 Upstream Author : Adam Ginsburg * URL : http://astroquery.readthedocs.org/ * License :