Bug#760720: qrouter review

2014-09-21 Thread Ruben Undheim
Hi, I don't have any problems with qrouter and tkcon2.7, but magic does not seem to like 2.7. And the second issue you mention is not really relevant for the debian package. So it shold be fine as it is now - letting it use the tkcon version available in debian. Then, Harlan, I think the package

Bug#760720: qrouter review

2014-09-20 Thread Tim Edwards
Hello Ruben, > After a closer look, it seems like the version bundled with qrouter > and magic is just an older version of tkcon.tcl (2.3). I don't see why > it would not work completely fine also with the newest version of > tkcon. I've tried qrouter with tkcon 2.7 and I don't see any problems >

Bug#760720: qrouter review

2014-09-20 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, 2014-09-20 at 10:26 +0200, Ruben Undheim wrote: > I've "implemented" option no.1 and pushed it to the git repo here: > git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-science/packages/qrouter.git That would be the best option, thanks. It would also be good to get upstream to remove their copy from thei

Bug#760720: qrouter review

2014-09-20 Thread Ruben Undheim
Hi again, I've "implemented" option no.1 and pushed it to the git repo here: git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-science/packages/qrouter.git Regards, Ruben 2014-09-20 10:13 GMT+02:00 Ruben Undheim : > Hi, > > After a closer look, it seems like the version bundled with qrouter > and magic is jus

Bug#760720: qrouter review

2014-09-20 Thread Ruben Undheim
Hi, After a closer look, it seems like the version bundled with qrouter and magic is just an older version of tkcon.tcl (2.3). I don't see why it would not work completely fine also with the newest version of tkcon. I've tried qrouter with tkcon 2.7 and I don't see any problems (maybe Tim knows mo

Bug#760720: qrouter review

2014-09-19 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 3:54 AM, Ruben Undheim wrote: > It seems like these are two different tkcon.tcl versions. I've seen > that the package "magic" also bundles a tkcon.tcl version. You are > possibly right here, but I would like to keep it as it is, as for now > at least. Are these independen