On 2014-09-27 18:49, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Robert Edmonds wrote:
Robert Edmonds wrote:
> node-mapnik
> ---
>
> This package Build-Depends against mapnik-vector-tile, which ships a
> .pb.h file in /usr/include (a bad upstream practice).
> mapnik-vector-tile needs to be binNMU'
Robert Edmonds wrote:
> Robert Edmonds wrote:
> > node-mapnik
> > ---
> >
> > This package Build-Depends against mapnik-vector-tile, which ships a
> > .pb.h file in /usr/include (a bad upstream practice).
> > mapnik-vector-tile needs to be binNMU'd first before node-mapnik can
Robert Edmonds wrote:
> node-mapnik
> ---
>
> This package Build-Depends against mapnik-vector-tile, which ships a
> .pb.h file in /usr/include (a bad upstream practice).
> mapnik-vector-tile needs to be binNMU'd first before node-mapnik can
> be binNMU'd.
It turns out nod
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 14/09/14 00:26, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> > I see a build failure on mips in the 'shogun' package:
> >
> >
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=shogun&arch=mips&ver=3.2.0-7.2%2Bb1&stamp=1410641206
> >
> > This is actually an architecture+compile
Robert Edmonds wrote:
> OK, protobuf 2.6.0-4 with the atomics fix is now in the archive and
> built on all architectures. Please give back shogun on mips.
Oh, nevermind, I see shogun was rebuilt on mips against protobuf 2.6.0-4
a few minutes ago.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
--
To UN
On 20/09/14 21:40, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>> On 2014-09-20 20:02, Robert Edmonds wrote:
>>> Robert Edmonds wrote:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> The delay ended but the signature seems invalid:
>
> 20140919160333|process-upload|dak|mapnik-vector-tile_0.5
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 15:02:58 -0400, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> Robert Edmonds wrote:
> > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > > The delay ended but the signature seems invalid:
> > >
> > > 20140919160333|process-upload|dak|mapnik-vector-tile_0.5.1+dfsg-1.1_multi.changes|Error
> > > while loading ch
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On 2014-09-20 20:02, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> >Robert Edmonds wrote:
> >>Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >>> The delay ended but the signature seems invalid:
> >>>
> >>> 20140919160333|process-upload|dak|mapnik-vector-tile_0.5.1+dfsg-1.1_multi.changes|Error
> >>> while lo
On 2014-09-20 20:02, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Robert Edmonds wrote:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> The delay ended but the signature seems invalid:
>
>
20140919160333|process-upload|dak|mapnik-vector-tile_0.5.1+dfsg-1.1_multi.changes|Error
> while loading changes: No valid signature found. (GPG e
Robert Edmonds wrote:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > The delay ended but the signature seems invalid:
> >
> > 20140919160333|process-upload|dak|mapnik-vector-tile_0.5.1+dfsg-1.1_multi.changes|Error
> > while loading changes: No valid signature found. (GPG exited with status
> > code 512)
> >
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> The delay ended but the signature seems invalid:
>
> 20140919160333|process-upload|dak|mapnik-vector-tile_0.5.1+dfsg-1.1_multi.changes|Error
> while loading changes: No valid signature found. (GPG exited with status code
> 512)
>
> Can you re-upload with a good si
On 14/09/14 15:26, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 13/09/14 20:46, Robert Edmonds wrote:
>> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 03/09/14 05:27, Robert Edmonds wrote:
node-mapnik
---
This package Build-Depends against mapnik-vector-tile, which ships a
.pb
Control: tags -1 + pending
On 14/09/14 00:26, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> I see a build failure on mips in the 'shogun' package:
>
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=shogun&arch=mips&ver=3.2.0-7.2%2Bb1&stamp=1410641206
>
> This is actually an architecture+compiler specific build
On 13/09/14 20:46, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 03/09/14 05:27, Robert Edmonds wrote:
>>> node-mapnik
>>> ---
>>>
>>> This package Build-Depends against mapnik-vector-tile, which ships a
>>> .pb.h file in /usr/include (a bad upstream practice).
>>>
I see a build failure on mips in the 'shogun' package:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=shogun&arch=mips&ver=3.2.0-7.2%2Bb1&stamp=1410641206
This is actually an architecture+compiler specific build failure.
(Funnily enough, shogun uses "clang++" on some architectures but "c++"
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 03/09/14 05:27, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> > node-mapnik
> > ---
> >
> > This package Build-Depends against mapnik-vector-tile, which ships a
> > .pb.h file in /usr/include (a bad upstream practice).
> > mapnik-vector-tile needs to be binNMU'd fi
On 03/09/14 05:27, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> node-mapnik
> ---
>
> This package Build-Depends against mapnik-vector-tile, which ships a
> .pb.h file in /usr/include (a bad upstream practice).
> mapnik-vector-tile needs to be binNMU'd first before node-mapnik can
> be binNMU'd
On 10/09/14 23:09, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> My only concern here is that we hit problems like on the previous
>> transitions,
>> this close to the freeze. But ia64 and sparc are no longer release
>> architectures
>> and you tested both on amd64 and s390x, and the l
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> I guess we could do those, better safe than sorry. However since they don't
> have
> any dependencies on libproto*, they will probably migrate instantly. I'm not
> sure that is the intended behaviour either.
>
> I have scheduled the first round of binNMUs (all but
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> My only concern here is that we hit problems like on the previous transitions,
> this close to the freeze. But ia64 and sparc are no longer release
> architectures
> and you tested both on amd64 and s390x, and the last time you did a good job
> in
> fixing the regr
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 03/09/14 05:27, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for submitting this bug so shortly before the upcoming cutoff on
> new transitions, but I'd
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
Sorry for submitting this bug so shortly before the upcoming cutoff on
new transitions, but I'd like to update protobuf to 2.6.0 for jessie,
which was just released last week. This
22 matches
Mail list logo
