Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 13/08/14 01:15, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >> On 12/08/14 03:11, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I think the transition is not quite over; there is still #756422, which
> >>> blocks #755212. We need a sourceful upload of
On 13/08/14 01:15, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 12/08/14 03:11, Robert Edmonds wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I think the transition is not quite over; there is still #756422, which
>>> blocks #755212. We need a sourceful upload of collectd in order to
>>> rebuild (or possib
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 12/08/14 03:11, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think the transition is not quite over; there is still #756422, which
> > blocks #755212. We need a sourceful upload of collectd in order to
> > rebuild (or possibly remove) the .pb-c.[ch] files in the coll
On 12/08/14 03:11, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think the transition is not quite over; there is still #756422, which
> blocks #755212. We need a sourceful upload of collectd in order to
> rebuild (or possibly remove) the .pb-c.[ch] files in the collectd-dev
> package, which is an "Architect
s.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=755212
> Debian Bug Tracking System
> Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
> Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 00:00:24 +0200
> From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> To: 755212-d...@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Bug#755212: transition: protobuf-c
Robert Edmonds wrote:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > I have binNMUed collectd and criu. Let me know if there's anything else that
> > needs binNMUs.
>
> Hi, Emilio:
>
> I don't see binNMUs for collectd or criu. I see collectd at version
> 5.4.1-3. But a recent criu upload transitioned the
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> I have binNMUed collectd and criu. Let me know if there's anything else that
> needs binNMUs.
Hi, Emilio:
I don't see binNMUs for collectd or criu. I see collectd at version
5.4.1-3. But a recent criu upload transitioned the package to
libprotobuf-c1. So I think
On 27/07/14 10:44, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> Robert Edmonds writes:
>
>> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 18/07/14 22:19, Robert Edmonds wrote:
* The header file (protobuf-c.h) which compiled .pb-c.h files must
include. This is shipped in the libprotobuf-c0-dev package
Robert Edmonds writes:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 18/07/14 22:19, Robert Edmonds wrote:
>> > * The header file (protobuf-c.h) which compiled .pb-c.h files must
>> > include. This is shipped in the libprotobuf-c0-dev package
>> > (protobuf-c < 1.0.0), or the libprotobuf
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 18/07/14 22:19, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> > * The header file (protobuf-c.h) which compiled .pb-c.h files must
> > include. This is shipped in the libprotobuf-c0-dev package
> > (protobuf-c < 1.0.0), or the libprotobuf-c-dev package (protobuf-c
> >
On 18/07/14 22:19, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> * The header file (protobuf-c.h) which compiled .pb-c.h files must
> include. This is shipped in the libprotobuf-c0-dev package
> (protobuf-c < 1.0.0), or the libprotobuf-c-dev package (protobuf-c
> >= 1.0.0). (libprotobuf-c-dev Pro
Gergely Nagy wrote:
> I gave this some more thought, and there's a problem: while generating
> riemann events and similar can be done with opaque types, if I do a
> query, then I want to access the results, and to do that with opaque
> types would mean I need a lot of getter functions (and an API +
Robert Edmonds writes:
>> The various riemann-c-client headers in /usr/include/riemann include
>> proto/riemann.pb-c.h, and there's syslog-ng-mod-riemann (from
>> syslog-ng-incubator) that uses the library, thus, the generated header
>> too, transitively.
>
> Ah, right. From a brief look at the
2014-07-21 23:41 GMT+02:00 Robert Edmonds :
> I looked over the changes to libgadu's convenience copy of protobuf-c.c
> and I *believe* that all the changes are relatively minor (fixing up
> warnings due to libgadu compiling with more -W flags, replacing
> C++-style comments with C89-compatible co
Hi, Gergely:
Gergely Nagy wrote:
> Robert Edmonds writes:
>
> > riemann-c-client
> >
> >
> > Rebuilt by hand successfully against protobuf-c 1.0.0~rc2-1 from
> > experimental.
> >
> > Has an unversioned build dependency on libprotobuf-c0-dev. This
> > needs to b
On 21/07/14 23:13, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> OK, IIUC, protobuf-c 1.0.0-1 may be uploaded to unstable?
Yes, or even rc2 if you feel comfortable with that.
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lis
Hi, Marcin:
Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> The problem with libgadu is that the embedded copy also seems to have
> libgadu-specific modifications applied. I've asked upstream to clarify
> whether these could be dropped.
I was able to build libgadu successfully with libprotobuf-c-dev added to
Build-Depen
Hi, Emilio:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> On 18/07/14 22:19, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> > I am requesting an upload slot to upload protobuf-c 1.0.0-1 to unstable.
> > I am hoping to accomplish a transition to protobuf-c 1.0.0 in time for
> > the jessie release. (Disclaimer: I am al
Robert Edmonds writes:
> riemann-c-client
>
>
> Rebuilt by hand successfully against protobuf-c 1.0.0~rc2-1 from
> experimental.
>
> Has an unversioned build dependency on libprotobuf-c0-dev. This
> needs to be updated to libprotobuf-c-dev eventually.
I can swit
The problem with libgadu is that the embedded copy also seems to have
libgadu-specific modifications applied. I've asked upstream to clarify
whether these could be dropped.
Marcin
Hi Robert,
On 18/07/14 22:19, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> I am requesting an upload slot to upload protobuf-c 1.0.0-1 to unstable.
> I am hoping to accomplish a transition to protobuf-c 1.0.0 in time for
> the jessie release. (Disclaimer: I am also one of the protobuf-c
> upstream maintainers.) This
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
I am requesting an upload slot to upload protobuf-c 1.0.0-1 to unstable.
I am hoping to accomplish a transition to protobuf-c 1.0.0 in time for
the jessie release. (Disclaimer: I
22 matches
Mail list logo
