On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:19:08PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> Yes I did, and it doesn't work correctly yet. So I'm planning to make it
> so when it tries to ifup a VLAN interface, it first tries to lock the
> physical interface it wants to create a VLAN on. I haven't finished that
> yet, but I'll
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:19:08PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> Yes I did, and it doesn't work correctly yet. So I'm planning to make it
> so when it tries to ifup a VLAN interface, it first tries to lock the
> physical interface it wants to create a VLAN on. I haven't finished that
> yet, but I'll
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 05:49:11PM +0200, Dariusz Gadomski wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 03:40:04PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> > Hm, looking at the code I don't think so, since a VLAN interface still
> > runs "ip link set dev bondX up", which may mess with the
> > if-pre-up.d/ifenslave script
Hello Guus!
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 03:40:04PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> Hm, looking at the code I don't think so, since a VLAN interface still
> runs "ip link set dev bondX up", which may mess with the
> if-pre-up.d/ifenslave script. I'll do some tests with the concurrency
> branch and VLANs o
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 03:40:04PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> But is it just ifup running in parallel, or is there also an
> ifup -a running at the same time?
According to my observations there is a single ifup call for
each interface and additionally there is a ifup -a called from another
scr
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 02:29:26PM +0200, Dariusz Gadomski wrote:
> The outline for this change is the way the interfaces are handled by
> upstart in Ubuntu. They are all brought up in parallel by independent
> processes, so there was a need for a universal mechanism to ensure the
> proper order o
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 06:27:37PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> Hi, I just adopted ifupdown from Andrew Shadura. Incidentally I'm also
> the ifenslave maintainer :)
Hello Guus, good luck with maintaining ifupdown :)
The outline for this change is the way the interfaces are handled by
upstart in U
Hi, I just adopted ifupdown from Andrew Shadura. Incidentally I'm also
the ifenslave maintainer :)
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 04:35:00PM +0200, Dariusz Gadomski wrote:
> After some discussions with Rafael and users affected by the race
> condition I have prepared a patch solving the problem by intro
Hello Maintainers!
After some discussions with Rafael and users affected by the race
condition I have prepared a patch solving the problem by introducing a
new stanza to the interfaces file:
allow-group-X-Y
where:
X is the group index
Y is the level in the hierarchy
This stanza allows to group i
9 matches
Mail list logo
