On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 02:58:20PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> That's true. IMO Gnu EFI needs to be patched to not include efistdarg.h by
> default and hide the vaargs functions if the header is not included. That
> would fix all issues.
>
> Or change it to define the va functions in terms
On 07/11/2014 02:58 PM, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> That's true. IMO Gnu EFI needs to be patched to not include efistdarg.h
> by default and hide the vaargs functions if the header is not included.
> That would fix all issues.
Thanks for the explanation! I didn't check the source of neither
gummi
Am 11.07.2014 13:43 schrieb "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz" <
glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de>:
>
> Hi Julian!
>
> Do you have a suggestion for the proper fix for this FTBFS? I have
> unapplied the patch #747158 but I'm still running into an FTBFS,
> but now it's just stdarg.h which is missing which is wh
Hi Julian!
Do you have a suggestion for the proper fix for this FTBFS? I have
unapplied the patch #747158 but I'm still running into an FTBFS,
but now it's just stdarg.h which is missing which is what Daniel
patched out:
gcc -I. -include config.h -I/usr/include/efi -I/usr/include/efi/x86_64
-DMA
Control: reassign -1 gnu-efi 3.0v-2
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 12:11:30PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Package: gummiboot
> Version: 44-1
> Severity: serious
>
> gummiboot's EFI binary fails to build from source with GCC 4.9
>
> gcc -I. -include config.h -I/usr/include/efi -I/usr/include/ef
Package: gummiboot
Version: 44-1
Severity: serious
gummiboot's EFI binary fails to build from source with GCC 4.9
gcc -I. -include config.h -I/usr/include/efi -I/usr/include/efi/x86_64
-DMACHINE_TYPE_NAME=\"x64\" -Wall -Wextra -nostdinc -ggdb -O0 -fpic
-fshort-wchar -nostdinc -ffreestanding -
6 matches
Mail list logo
