On Mon, 18 Jan 2016, Wookey wrote:
> As explained by David, #666772 isn't getting fixed anytime soon.
> Indeed the consensus is that we are not going to use that expedient
> aproximation. Instead, individual packages will be marked as
> appropriate. So please apply the patch provided and upload.
I
Package: src:scowl
Followup-For: Bug #752589
As explained by David, #666772 isn't getting fixed anytime soon.
Indeed the consensus is that we are not going to use that expedient
aproximation. Instead, individual packages will be marked as
appropriate. So please apply the patch provided and upload.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 06:09:38PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, Frédéric Brière wrote:
> > Marking all packages providing wordlist as "Multi-Arch: foreign" would
> > allow them to satisfy dependencies from packages of foreign
> > architectures.
[…]
> 2) This particular issue
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, Frédéric Brière wrote:
> Marking all packages providing wordlist as "Multi-Arch: foreign" would
> allow them to satisfy dependencies from packages of foreign
> architectures.
Thanks for filing these bugs, but there are a couple of issues here:
1) This appears to be a mass bu
Source: scowl
Version: 7.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: multiarch
Marking all packages providing wordlist as "Multi-Arch: foreign" would
allow them to satisfy dependencies from packages of foreign
architectures.
(I also included the scow
5 matches
Mail list logo