Bug#751776: time: diff for NMU version 1.7-25.1

2017-09-24 Thread Bob Proulx
Hello Manuel, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: > It seems that the changelog [1] mentions "Addresses", not "Closes", > therefore this bug report has not been closed even if the original > problem has really been fixed. That NMU only "addressed" bug#751776 but didn't close it because there wer

Bug#751776: time: diff for NMU version 1.7-25.1

2017-09-24 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Hi all, 2015-07-22 06:59 Helmut Grohne: Hi Bob, On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:11:36PM -0500, Bob Proulx wrote: I think that will be perfectly fine. Thank you for doing that. You could upload it to a shorter delay if you desired to get it through earlier. Thanks for your positive reply appreci

Bug#751776: time: diff for NMU version 1.7-25.1

2015-07-21 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Bob, On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:11:36PM -0500, Bob Proulx wrote: > I think that will be perfectly fine. Thank you for doing that. You > could upload it to a shorter delay if you desired to get it through > earlier. Thanks for your positive reply appreciating my NMU. I have rescheduled it to

Bug#751776: time: diff for NMU version 1.7-25.1

2015-07-21 Thread Bob Proulx
Helmut Grohne wrote: > I've prepared an NMU for time (versioned as 1.7-25.1) which marks the > time package Multi-Arch: foreign and uploaded it to DELAYED/15. Without > this change, the bash package FTCBFS. Please feel free to tell me if I > should delay it longer. I think that will be perfectly f

Bug#751776: time: diff for NMU version 1.7-25.1

2015-07-21 Thread Helmut Grohne
Dear time maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for time (versioned as 1.7-25.1) which marks the time package Multi-Arch: foreign and uploaded it to DELAYED/15. Without this change, the bash package FTCBFS. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Helmut diff -Nru time-1.7/debian/chang